Define: Nominal Consideration

Nominal Consideration
Nominal Consideration
Quick Summary of Nominal Consideration

Nominal consideration is a legal term that refers to a small or insignificant amount of money or value given in exchange for something else. For instance, if someone were to sell a car for only $1, this would be considered nominal consideration. However, it is important to note that courts typically do not assess the adequacy of consideration, meaning that nominal consideration can still be considered valid. Consideration, on the other hand, is something that serves as a motivation for a person to engage in a legal act. It can take the form of an action, a forbearance, or a promise in return. In order for an agreement to be enforceable, consideration, or a substitute such as promissory estoppel, is necessary.

What is the dictionary definition of Nominal Consideration?
Dictionary Definition of Nominal Consideration

Nominal consideration refers to a form of consideration that is so insignificant that it has no correlation to the value of the items being exchanged. It can take the form of a small sum of money or a trivial action. Despite its insignificance, nominal consideration can still be deemed valid in a contract, as courts typically do not assess the adequacy of consideration. For instance, if someone sells a property worth $100,000 for $10, the transaction can still be considered valid since the parties have mutually agreed to the terms. In this scenario, the $10 paid for the real estate serves as the nominal consideration. Although the amount paid is significantly lower than the property’s value, the transaction remains valid due to the parties’ agreement. While courts generally do not scrutinise the adequacy of consideration, they may investigate matters such as fraud and duress.

Full Definition Of Nominal Consideration

Nominal consideration is a legal concept used primarily in contract law to denote a minimal value, often a token amount, given in exchange for a contractual promise. Despite its seemingly insignificant value, nominal consideration plays a crucial role in establishing the enforceability of contracts. This overview explores the concept of nominal consideration, its purposes, applications, and implications within the framework of British contract law.

Defining Nominal Consideration

Nominal consideration refers to a token amount of value, usually a small sum such as £1 or even a single penny, provided in a contract to satisfy the requirement of consideration. Consideration is one of the essential elements of a valid contract, alongside offer, acceptance, and the intention to create legal relations. It represents the value each party agrees to exchange as part of the contractual agreement.

In legal terms, consideration must be something of value in the eyes of the law, though it need not be adequate. This principle is encapsulated in the maxim “consideration need not be adequate, but it must be sufficient.” Nominal consideration, therefore, serves as a symbolic gesture to fulfil the legal requirement without necessarily reflecting the actual value of the exchanged goods or services.

Purpose and Rationale

The use of nominal consideration serves several important purposes in contract law:

  • Legal Formality: Nominal consideration helps to formalise an agreement, signalling that the parties intend to enter into a legally binding contract. By including a token amount, the parties acknowledge the presence of consideration and satisfy a fundamental requirement of contract law.
  • Avoiding Gratuitous Promises: The principle of consideration distinguishes between enforceable promises and mere gifts, or gratuitous promises. By requiring consideration, the law ensures that only those promises made in exchange for value are legally binding. Nominal consideration acts as a safeguard against the enforcement of purely gratuitous promises.
  • Symbolic Gesture: In some cases, nominal consideration is used symbolically to indicate the parties’ mutual consent and understanding of the contract. It can serve as a form of acknowledgement or recognition of the agreement’s existence and terms.
  • Simplifying Transactions: The actual value exchanged may be minimal in certain transactions, particularly those involving the transfer of nominal assets or rights. Nominal consideration simplifies the process by providing a standardised, minimal value to be included in the contract.

Applications of Nominal Consideration

Nominal consideration finds application in various contractual contexts, including:

  • Deeds: In English law, deeds are a special form of contract that does not require consideration to be binding. However, it is common practice to include nominal consideration in deeds to reinforce the parties’ intention to create legal relations and avoid any potential disputes over the deed’s validity.
  • Options Contracts: In options contracts, one party pays nominal consideration to obtain the right, but not the obligation, to buy or sell an asset at a predetermined price within a specified period. The nominal consideration ensures that the option agreement is enforceable.
  • Transfers of Intellectual Property: When transferring intellectual property rights, nominal consideration may be used to formalise the agreement and provide legal certainty. This is particularly relevant when intellectual property has minimal or uncertain value.
  • Company Incorporations and Share Transfers: In corporate law, nominal consideration is often used to issue and transfer shares. For example, a company might issue shares for a nominal amount to founders or early investors to establish ownership and control structures.

Legal Principles and Case Law

Several legal principles support the idea of nominal consideration, and judicial interpretations have shaped it over time. Key principles and landmark cases include:

  • Sufficiency of Consideration: The principle that consideration must be sufficient but not adequate is well-established in English law. This means that as long as the consideration has some value in the eyes of the law, its adequacy in economic terms is irrelevant. In the case of Thomas v. Thomas (1842), the court held that a promise to pay a nominal rent of £1 per year was sufficient consideration to support a contract.
  • Peppercorn Principle: The notion that a nominal or token amount can constitute valid consideration is often called the “peppercorn principle.” This term originates from the practice of using a peppercorn as a token payment to satisfy the requirement of consideration. The case of Chappell & Co Ltd v. Nestle Co Ltd (1960) affirmed that even something as trivial as chocolate wrappers could constitute valid consideration if it was part of the bargain between the parties.
  • Intention to Create Legal Relations: Including nominal consideration can also demonstrate the parties’ intention to create legal relations, a necessary element for contract enforceability. In Edwards v. Skyways Ltd. (1964), the court emphasised that consideration, even if nominal, indicated a clear intention to enter into a binding contract.
  • Enforceability of Nominal Consideration: While nominal consideration is generally accepted as sufficient, there are instances where courts have scrutinised the genuineness of the consideration provided. In White v. Bluett (1853), the court ruled that a son’s promise to stop complaining to his father was not valid consideration, as it lacked tangible value and was more akin to a moral obligation.

Criticisms and Limitations

Despite its widespread use, nominal consideration has faced criticisms and limitations:

  • Artificiality: Critics argue that nominal consideration is an artificial construct that undermines the principle of mutual exchange in contracts. By allowing token amounts to satisfy the requirement of consideration, the law may enforce agreements that lack substantive economic value.
  • Potential for Abuse: The use of nominal consideration can be susceptible to abuse, particularly in cases where one party seeks to enforce a contract based on a token amount that was never intended to reflect genuine value. This can lead to disputes and challenges regarding the validity of the contract.
  • Judicial Discretion: The reliance on nominal consideration places significant discretion in the hands of judges, who must determine whether the consideration provided is sufficient and genuine. This can result in inconsistencies in judicial decisions and uncertainty in contract enforcement.
  • Economic Irrelevance: In commercial transactions, nominal consideration may be considered economically irrelevant, as it does not reflect the value of the exchanged goods or services. This can lead to questions about the fairness and equity of the contractual arrangement.

Practical Considerations

For practitioners and parties involved in drafting contracts, several practical considerations should be taken into account when using nominal consideration:

  • Clarity and Precision: Contracts should specify the amount and nature of the nominal consideration. This helps to avoid any ambiguity or disputes over the sufficiency of consideration.
  • Documentation and Evidence: Maintaining proper documentation and evidence of the nominal consideration can be crucial in demonstrating the parties’ intention to create legal relations and the existence of valid consideration.
  • Alternative Mechanisms: In cases where nominal consideration may be seen as insufficient or problematic, parties can consider alternative mechanisms, such as deeds, which do not require consideration to be enforceable.
  • Legal Advice: Seeking legal advice is advisable to ensure that nominal consideration is appropriate for the specific contractual context and complies with relevant legal principles and precedents.


Despite its minimal economic value, nominal consideration plays a vital role in the formation and enforceability of contracts in British law. It fulfils the legal requirement of consideration, formalises agreements, and distinguishes enforceable promises from gratuitous ones. While it has faced criticism and limitations, nominal consideration remains widely accepted and utilised in various contractual contexts. Understanding its principles, applications, and practical considerations is essential for legal practitioners and parties involved in contract formation.

Nominal Consideration FAQ'S

Nominal consideration refers to a small or token amount of money or value exchanged between parties in a contract. It is often used to satisfy the requirement of consideration in a contract, even though the amount exchanged may not reflect the true value of the transaction.

Yes, nominal consideration is generally considered legally sufficient to support a contract. As long as there is some exchange of value, even if it is minimal, it can fulfil the requirement of consideration.

In some cases, nominal consideration can be challenged in court if it is deemed to be unconscionable or fraudulent. However, it is generally upheld as long as there is a genuine intention to create a legal relationship.

There are no specific limitations on nominal consideration, as long as it meets the basic requirement of being an exchange of value. However, parties should be cautious not to use nominal consideration as a means to deceive or defraud others.

Yes, nominal consideration can be used in various types of contracts, including sales agreements, leases, employment contracts, and more. It is common practice to include nominal consideration to ensure the enforceability of the contract.

The tax implications of nominal consideration may vary depending on the jurisdiction and the specific circumstances. It is advisable to consult with a tax professional to determine the tax treatment of nominal consideration in a particular situation.

In general, once a contract is signed, the terms, including the nominal consideration, become legally binding. However, parties may mutually agree to modify the terms of the contract, including the consideration, through a formal amendment or a new agreement.

Using nominal consideration to avoid legal obligations or deceive others is not advisable and may be considered fraudulent. Parties should always act in good faith and ensure that the consideration reflects the true value of the transaction.

While consideration is a fundamental element of a contract, it does not always have to be in the form of nominal consideration. Other forms of consideration, such as money, goods, services, or promises, can also be used to create a legally binding contract.

In bankruptcy proceedings, nominal consideration may be subject to scrutiny if it is found to be a fraudulent transfer or an attempt to hide assets. It is important to consult with a bankruptcy attorney to understand the implications of nominal consideration in such situations.

Related Phrases
No related content found.

This site contains general legal information but does not constitute professional legal advice for your particular situation. Persuing this glossary does not create an attorney-client or legal adviser relationship. If you have specific questions, please consult a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.

This glossary post was last updated: 11th June 2024.

Cite Term

To help you cite our definitions in your bibliography, here is the proper citation layout for the three major formatting styles, with all of the relevant information filled in.

  • Page URL:
  • Modern Language Association (MLA):Nominal Consideration. DLS Solicitors. June 20 2024
  • Chicago Manual of Style (CMS):Nominal Consideration. DLS Solicitors. (accessed: June 20 2024).
  • American Psychological Association (APA):Nominal Consideration. Retrieved June 20 2024, from website:
Avatar of DLS Solicitors
DLS Solicitors : Family Law Solicitors

Our team of professionals are based in Alderley Edge, Cheshire. We offer clear, specialist legal advice in all matters relating to Family Law, Wills, Trusts, Probate, Lasting Power of Attorney and Court of Protection.

All author posts