Nonliteral infringement is a legal concept employed in patent cases to establish infringement even when the accused product or process is not identical to the patented invention. This principle was established to prevent parties from evading liability for patent infringement by making minor alterations to the product or process. In order to determine if infringement has occurred, the court must first ascertain whether the accused product or process includes an element that is identical or equivalent to each claimed element of the patented invention. If it does, infringement is deemed to have occurred if the differing element performs the same function in the same way to achieve the same result as the patented product or process.
Nonliteral infringement is a legal concept utilised in patent law to establish infringement when the accused product or process does not fall within the exact wording of the patent claims. This concept was developed to prevent parties from evading liability for patent infringement by making insignificant modifications to the product or process in order to avoid the literal language of the patent claims. For instance, if a patent claims a device with a specific component, and another company creates a device without that exact component but with an equivalent component that performs the same function in the same manner to achieve the same outcome, it may still be considered infringement under the doctrine of equivalents. The doctrine of equivalents does not completely prevent a patentee from invoking it to prove infringement on a claim that was voluntarily amended. However, the scope of the doctrine may be limited by prosecution-history estoppel. In summary, nonliteral infringement serves as a means to safeguard patent holders from infringers who attempt to make minor alterations to evade liability.
Nonliteral infringement refers to the unauthorized use or reproduction of copyrighted material in a way that may not be an exact copy but still violates the original creator’s rights.
Literal infringement involves the direct copying or reproduction of copyrighted material, while nonliteral infringement involves using elements or concepts from the original work in a way that may not be an exact copy.
Examples of nonliteral infringement can include using similar characters, plotlines, or themes from a copyrighted work without permission, creating derivative works that are substantially similar to the original, or using a similar style or format.
To determine nonliteral infringement, you need to compare the original work with the allegedly infringing work and analyze the similarities in characters, plotlines, themes, or other elements. Consulting with a legal professional experienced in copyright law can help in this process.
Courts consider various factors, including the degree of similarity between the original and allegedly infringing work, the significance of the similarities, the level of creativity involved, and whether the alleged infringer had access to the original work.
Yes, nonliteral infringement can occur in various forms of creative work, including literature, music, visual arts, films, and software.
The consequences of nonliteral infringement can include legal action by the copyright owner, potential damages or financial penalties, injunctions to stop further infringement, and the requirement to pay the copyright owner’s legal fees.
Nonliteral infringement can be unintentional if the alleged infringer genuinely believed they were not copying the original work or if they were unaware of the copyright protection. However, unintentional infringement does not absolve one from liability.
To protect your work from nonliteral infringement, it is essential to register your copyright with the appropriate authorities, clearly mark your work with copyright notices, and monitor for any potential infringements. Consulting with an intellectual property attorney can also help in understanding and enforcing your rights.
Common defences in nonliteral infringement cases include fair use, transformative use, lack of substantial similarity, independent creation, and lack of access to the original work. The availability and success of these defences depend on the specific circumstances of each case.
This site contains general legal information but does not constitute professional legal advice for your particular situation. Persuing this glossary does not create an attorney-client or legal adviser relationship. If you have specific questions, please consult a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.
This glossary post was last updated: 17th April 2024.
To help you cite our definitions in your bibliography, here is the proper citation layout for the three major formatting styles, with all of the relevant information filled in.
- Page URL:https://dlssolicitors.com/define/nonliteral-infringement/
- Modern Language Association (MLA):Nonliteral Infringement. dlssolicitors.com. DLS Solicitors. May 09 2024 https://dlssolicitors.com/define/nonliteral-infringement/.
- Chicago Manual of Style (CMS):Nonliteral Infringement. dlssolicitors.com. DLS Solicitors. https://dlssolicitors.com/define/nonliteral-infringement/ (accessed: May 09 2024).
- American Psychological Association (APA):Nonliteral Infringement. dlssolicitors.com. Retrieved May 09 2024, from dlssolicitors.com website: https://dlssolicitors.com/define/nonliteral-infringement/
Our team of professionals are based in Alderley Edge, Cheshire. We offer clear, specialist legal advice in all matters relating to Family Law, Wills, Trusts, Probate, Lasting Power of Attorney and Court of Protection.
All author posts