Double patenting occurs when an individual attempts to obtain a patent for an invention that is too similar to another invention for which they already hold a patent. This is prohibited because multiple patents for the same thing are not allowed. It is akin to trying to acquire two stickers for the same picture. There are two forms of double patenting: same-invention double patenting, where the inventions are identical, and obviousness-type double patenting, where the inventions are very similar but contain unpatentable small differences. If an individual attempts to obtain a double patent, their application may be rejected or their existing patent may be invalidated.
Obviousness double patenting occurs when an inventor attempts to patent an invention that is too similar to another invention they have already patented or have a pending patent application for. There are two ways in which this can happen. The first is statutory double patenting, which involves attempting to patent the same invention twice. This is not allowed and can result in the invalidation of the patent claim or rejection of the patent application. The second is judicially created double patenting, which involves attempting to patent an invention that is an obvious variation of another invention the inventor has already patented or has a pending patent application for. This is also not allowed and can result in the rejection of the patent application, limitation of the patent term through a terminal disclaimer, or invalidation of the patent. For instance, if an inventor has already patented a silicone phone case, they cannot then try to patent a rubber phone case as it would be considered too similar and would be considered obviousness double patenting.
Obviousness double patenting is a legal concept that prevents an inventor from obtaining two patents for essentially the same invention. It ensures that an inventor cannot extend their exclusive rights by obtaining multiple patents for obvious variations of their original invention.
Regular double patenting occurs when an inventor obtains two separate patents for the same invention, while obviousness double patenting occurs when an inventor obtains two patents for obvious variations of the same invention. The focus in obviousness double patenting is on whether the variations are obvious to a person skilled in the relevant field.
The purpose of obviousness double patenting is to prevent an inventor from unduly extending their monopoly rights by obtaining multiple patents for obvious variations of their original invention. It promotes fair competition and ensures that the patent system is not abused.
Obviousness in the context of double patenting is determined by assessing whether the variations claimed in the second patent would have been obvious to a person skilled in the relevant field at the time of filing the first patent. If the variations would have been obvious, the second patent may be invalidated.
Yes, obviousness double patenting can be overcome by demonstrating that the variations claimed in the second patent are not obvious to a person skilled in the relevant field. This can be done by providing evidence of unexpected results, non-obvious advantages, or other factors that support the inventiveness of the variations.
Yes, obviousness double patenting can be used as a defence in patent infringement cases. If a defendant can prove that the plaintiff’s second patent is invalid due to obviousness double patenting, it can help in defending against allegations of patent infringement.
Yes, obviousness double patenting can be challenged during the patent application process. Third parties can submit prior art or arguments to the patent office to demonstrate that the variations claimed in the second patent are obvious and should not be granted a separate patent.
Yes, there are exceptions to obviousness double patenting. For example, if the second patent claims a different invention that is not obvious in light of the first patent, it may be allowed. Additionally, certain jurisdictions may have specific rules or exceptions to obviousness double patenting.
Yes, if a patent is found to be invalid due to obviousness double patenting, it can affect the enforceability of the patent. The patent holder may not be able to assert the patent against alleged infringers or may face challenges in enforcing their exclusive rights.
Yes, obviousness double patenting can be avoided by carefully considering the scope of the claims in the first patent and ensuring that any subsequent patent applications claim non-obvious variations of the original invention. Conducting a thorough prior art search and consulting with a patent attorney can help in avoiding obviousness double patenting issues.
This site contains general legal information but does not constitute professional legal advice for your particular situation. Persuing this glossary does not create an attorney-client or legal adviser relationship. If you have specific questions, please consult a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.
This glossary post was last updated: 17th April 2024.
To help you cite our definitions in your bibliography, here is the proper citation layout for the three major formatting styles, with all of the relevant information filled in.
- Page URL:https://dlssolicitors.com/define/obviousness-double-patenting/
- Modern Language Association (MLA):Obviousness Double Patenting. dlssolicitors.com. DLS Solicitors. May 09 2024 https://dlssolicitors.com/define/obviousness-double-patenting/.
- Chicago Manual of Style (CMS):Obviousness Double Patenting. dlssolicitors.com. DLS Solicitors. https://dlssolicitors.com/define/obviousness-double-patenting/ (accessed: May 09 2024).
- American Psychological Association (APA):Obviousness Double Patenting. dlssolicitors.com. Retrieved May 09 2024, from dlssolicitors.com website: https://dlssolicitors.com/define/obviousness-double-patenting/
Our team of professionals are based in Alderley Edge, Cheshire. We offer clear, specialist legal advice in all matters relating to Family Law, Wills, Trusts, Probate, Lasting Power of Attorney and Court of Protection.
All author posts