Define: Per Fas Aut Nefas

“Per Fas Aut Nefas” is a Latin phrase that translates to “through right or wrong.” It refers to the concept of taking action regardless of whether it is legally permissible or not.

No, acting “Per Fas Aut Nefas” implies engaging in actions that may be morally or ethically wrong, even if they are not explicitly illegal. It is always advisable to act within the boundaries of the law.

While there may not be specific laws against acting “Per Fas Aut Nefas,” individuals can still be held accountable for their actions if they violate existing laws or cause harm to others.

Claiming “Per Fas Aut Nefas” as a defence is unlikely to hold up in court. The legal system generally does not recognize this concept as a valid defence for breaking the law.

In most cases, acting “Per Fas Aut Nefas” would not be considered a mitigating factor. Courts typically focus on the specific circumstances of the case and the intent of the individual when determining sentencing.

If it can be proven that a contract was entered into through fraudulent or illegal means, it may be possible to have the contract invalidated. However, this would depend on the specific circumstances and applicable laws.

Employers have the right to terminate employees for engaging in behavior that reflects poorly on the company or violates their code of conduct, even if the actions occurred outside of work. However, this would depend on the employment contract and applicable laws.

While it is possible to use various defences in a civil lawsuit, claiming “Per Fas Aut Nefas” is unlikely to be successful. Courts generally focus on the legal rights and obligations of the parties involved, rather than the moral or ethical justifications for their actions.

If the actions taken “Per Fas Aut Nefas” involve criminal behavior, such as theft, assault, or fraud, it can certainly lead to criminal charges. The legality of the actions will be determined by the specific laws of the jurisdiction.

Using “Per Fas Aut Nefas” as a defence in a criminal trial is unlikely to be successful. Courts generally focus on the specific elements of the crime committed and the intent of the accused, rather than any moral or ethical justifications for their actions.