Define: Quae Non Mente Sed Manu Tenentur

“Quae Non Mente Sed Manu Tenentur” is a Latin phrase that translates to “What is held not by the mind but by the hand.” It refers to the concept that legal rights and obligations are determined by physical actions rather than mere intentions or thoughts.

In contract law, “Quae Non Mente Sed Manu Tenentur” emphasizes the importance of written agreements and physical execution of contracts. It implies that a contract is legally binding when it is signed and executed, regardless of any prior verbal or mental agreements.

No, “Quae Non Mente Sed Manu Tenentur” is not a valid defence in a criminal case. It is a principle that primarily applies to civil law matters, particularly contract law.

“Quae Non Mente Sed Manu Tenentur” is relevant to property rights as it emphasizes the importance of physical possession and control. It implies that ownership and rights over property are established through physical occupation or control, rather than mere mental claims.

Yes, “Quae Non Mente Sed Manu Tenentur” can be relevant in challenging a will. If there is evidence that the testator did not physically sign the will or that it was executed under duress or undue influence, it may undermine the validity of the will.

No, “Quae Non Mente Sed Manu Tenentur” does not directly apply to intellectual property rights. Intellectual property rights are primarily established through registration, creation, or invention, rather than physical possession or control.

Yes, “Quae Non Mente Sed Manu Tenentur” can be relevant in proving a case of assault. Physical contact or harm caused by the defendant’s actions can be crucial evidence in establishing the offense.

In employment contracts, “Quae Non Mente Sed Manu Tenentur” emphasizes the importance of written agreements and physical execution. It implies that a valid employment contract is established when both parties sign and execute the agreement, rather than relying solely on verbal or mental agreements.

“Quae Non Mente Sed Manu Tenentur” may not directly apply to challenging a divorce settlement. Divorce settlements are primarily governed by family law principles and the specific laws of the jurisdiction, rather than the concept of physical possession or control.

“Quae Non Mente Sed Manu Tenentur” is not directly applicable to criminal liability. Criminal liability is determined by the commission of a prohibited act (actus reus) and the presence of a guilty mind (mens rea), rather than solely relying on physical actions.