Quasi ex delicto refers to a situation that seems to be a consequence of wrongdoing, even if it is not an actual offence. This term is commonly used in historical legal settings to describe cases where individuals may be held liable for unintentional or indirect damages or losses. Essentially, it implies that someone is being held responsible for something they did not intentionally do, yet still resulted in negative outcomes for others.
Quasi ex delicto, a Latin term meaning “arising as if from delict,” refers to a situation where an individual is held accountable for damages or losses despite not directly causing any wrongful act. Instead, their responsibility stems from a legal obligation or duty that they failed to fulfil. For instance, a property owner can be held liable for injuries that occur on their premises, even if they did not cause the injury themselves. An example would be if someone slips and falls on a wet floor in a store, the store owner may be held responsible for the injuries, even if they did not intentionally cause the spill. This is because the store owner had a duty to maintain a safe environment for customers, which they failed to fulfil. Another instance of quasi ex delicto is when a company is held accountable for environmental damage caused by their operations, even if they did not have the intention to cause harm. In this case, the company had a duty to take reasonable measures to prevent environmental damage, but they failed to fulfil that duty. These examples demonstrate how quasi ex delicto can impose liability for damages or losses that arise from a legal duty or obligation, regardless of the absence of a specific wrongful act.
Quasi ex delicto refers to a legal concept that holds a person liable for damages even if they did not commit a deliberate wrongful act. It is based on the principle that a person should be responsible for the consequences of their actions, regardless of intent.
Examples of quasi ex delicto situations include negligence cases, where a person’s careless actions result in harm to another, and strict liability cases, where a person is held responsible for damages caused by their inherently dangerous activities or products.
Ex delicto refers to liability arising from intentional wrongful acts, while quasi ex delicto encompasses liability for unintentional or negligent acts. The key difference lies in the intent behind the actions that caused the harm.
The purpose of quasi ex delicto is to ensure that individuals are held accountable for the harm they cause, regardless of their intent. It promotes fairness and justice by compensating victims and discouraging negligent behavior.
To establish liability in a quasi ex delicto case, the plaintiff must typically prove that the defendant owed them a duty of care, breached that duty through negligence or strict liability, and that the breach caused the plaintiff’s damages.
Yes, under certain circumstances, a person can be held liable under quasi ex delicto even if they were not directly involved in the incident. For example, employers can be held vicariously liable for the negligent actions of their employees during the course of employment.
Yes, defendants in quasi ex delicto cases can raise various defences, such as contributory negligence (where the plaintiff’s own negligence contributed to their injuries) or assumption of risk (where the plaintiff voluntarily assumed the risk of harm).
In quasi ex delicto cases, plaintiffs may be entitled to various types of damages, including compensation for medical expenses, lost wages, pain and suffering, and property damage. The specific damages awarded depend on the circumstances of the case.
Yes, there is typically a statute of limitations that sets a time limit for filing a quasi ex delicto lawsuit. The specific time limit varies depending on the jurisdiction and the nature of the claim, so it is important to consult with an attorney to ensure compliance with the applicable deadline.
No, quasi ex delicto is a civil concept that deals with civil liability for damages. Criminal liability, on the other hand, involves intentional acts that violate criminal laws. However, the same set of facts can give rise to both civil and criminal liability in certain cases.
This site contains general legal information but does not constitute professional legal advice for your particular situation. Persuing this glossary does not create an attorney-client or legal adviser relationship. If you have specific questions, please consult a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.
This glossary post was last updated: 17th April 2024.
To help you cite our definitions in your bibliography, here is the proper citation layout for the three major formatting styles, with all of the relevant information filled in.
- Page URL:https://dlssolicitors.com/define/quasi-ex-delicto/
- Modern Language Association (MLA):Quasi Ex Delicto. dlssolicitors.com. DLS Solicitors. May 09 2024 https://dlssolicitors.com/define/quasi-ex-delicto/.
- Chicago Manual of Style (CMS):Quasi Ex Delicto. dlssolicitors.com. DLS Solicitors. https://dlssolicitors.com/define/quasi-ex-delicto/ (accessed: May 09 2024).
- American Psychological Association (APA):Quasi Ex Delicto. dlssolicitors.com. Retrieved May 09 2024, from dlssolicitors.com website: https://dlssolicitors.com/define/quasi-ex-delicto/
Our team of professionals are based in Alderley Edge, Cheshire. We offer clear, specialist legal advice in all matters relating to Family Law, Wills, Trusts, Probate, Lasting Power of Attorney and Court of Protection.
All author posts