A remote cause refers to an event that occurred in the distant past and did not directly lead to the issue at hand, but still had a role in its occurrence. For instance, in the case of a tree falling on a house during a storm, the remote cause could be attributed to the tree being weakened by a disease many years prior. While it may not be the primary cause, it nonetheless contributed to the problem.
Definition:
A remote cause refers to a factor that may not directly or immediately result in an event or injury. For instance, consider a scenario where a pedestrian is hit by a car while crossing the street. The remote cause of this accident could be attributed to the pedestrian’s distraction caused by their phone, which prevented them from noticing the approaching car. This example highlights that the pedestrian’s distraction was not the immediate cause of the accident, but it contributed to the chain of events leading to it. Evaluating the remote cause is crucial in establishing liability and responsibility for the accident.
Remote cause refers to a cause that is not directly connected to the outcome or harm in question but still contributes to it in some way. It is a concept used in determining liability and causation in legal cases.
Proximate cause refers to the cause that is directly connected to the outcome or harm, while remote cause refers to a cause that is indirectly connected but still contributes to the outcome.
Yes, remote cause can be used to establish liability if it can be proven that the remote cause played a significant role in causing the harm or outcome in question.
In determining remote cause, factors such as foreseeability, causation, and the extent of the remote cause’s contribution to the harm are considered.
Yes, it is possible to identify multiple remote causes in a legal case if there are multiple factors that contribute to the harm or outcome.
Remote cause alone may not absolve someone of liability, as it depends on the specific circumstances and the extent of their involvement in causing the harm. However, it can potentially reduce the degree of liability.
Proving remote cause often requires gathering evidence, expert testimony, and demonstrating a clear link between the remote cause and the harm or outcome.
Yes, there are limitations to using remote cause, as it must be shown that the remote cause was a substantial factor in causing the harm and not just a remote possibility.
Yes, remote cause can be used in criminal cases to establish causation and determine the degree of liability or responsibility.
Remote cause can impact the calculation of damages by determining the extent to which each cause contributed to the harm, and thus, the proportionate liability of each party involved.
This site contains general legal information but does not constitute professional legal advice for your particular situation. Persuing this glossary does not create an attorney-client or legal adviser relationship. If you have specific questions, please consult a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.
This glossary post was last updated: 17th April 2024.
To help you cite our definitions in your bibliography, here is the proper citation layout for the three major formatting styles, with all of the relevant information filled in.
- Page URL:https://dlssolicitors.com/define/remote-cause/
- Modern Language Association (MLA):Remote Cause. dlssolicitors.com. DLS Solicitors. May 09 2024 https://dlssolicitors.com/define/remote-cause/.
- Chicago Manual of Style (CMS):Remote Cause. dlssolicitors.com. DLS Solicitors. https://dlssolicitors.com/define/remote-cause/ (accessed: May 09 2024).
- American Psychological Association (APA):Remote Cause. dlssolicitors.com. Retrieved May 09 2024, from dlssolicitors.com website: https://dlssolicitors.com/define/remote-cause/
Our team of professionals are based in Alderley Edge, Cheshire. We offer clear, specialist legal advice in all matters relating to Family Law, Wills, Trusts, Probate, Lasting Power of Attorney and Court of Protection.
All author posts