A remote possibility refers to a highly unlikely occurrence. It is akin to having a hopeful desire for something to happen, despite knowing that the chances are slim. While not impossible, it is also not very probable. In certain cases, the term “remote possibility” is used to describe a situation where multiple events must transpire before another event can occur, but the likelihood of those events happening is low.
A remote possibility refers to the chance or likelihood of something happening that is highly unlikely to occur. It is characterized by being dependent on two or more uncertain and contingent events. For instance, it is a remote possibility that snow will fall in the middle of summer, that the stock market will crash tomorrow, or that aliens exist and will visit Earth. These examples exemplify the concept of remote possibility as they all describe events that are highly improbable. They rely on multiple uncertain factors and are considered double possibilities.
Remote possibility refers to a situation where the chances of a particular event occurring are extremely unlikely or improbable.
Yes, if there is a remote possibility that a defendant did not commit the alleged offense, it can be used as a defence to challenge the prosecution’s case.
Remote possibility refers to an event being highly unlikely, whereas reasonable doubt is a higher standard that requires the prosecution to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
Yes, if there is a remote possibility that the defendant is not liable for the alleged harm, it can impact the outcome of a civil lawsuit.
There are no specific legal standards or guidelines to determine the threshold of a remote possibility. It is generally assessed on a case-by-case basis.
Yes, if there is a remote possibility that a contract was entered into under duress, fraud, or coercion, it can be used to challenge the validity of the contract.
In certain cases, if new evidence emerges that establishes a remote possibility of the defendant’s innocence, it can be grounds for appealing a criminal conviction.
If there is a remote possibility that the defendant’s actions did not cause the plaintiff’s injuries, it can be used as a defence to avoid liability in a personal injury case.
Yes, if there is a remote possibility that the evidence was obtained illegally or is unreliable, it can be used to challenge its admissibility in court.
While a remote possibility can be raised as a defence or challenge, it generally cannot be used solely to delay or prolong legal proceedings. The court will assess the merits of the argument and determine its relevance and impact on the case.
This site contains general legal information but does not constitute professional legal advice for your particular situation. Persuing this glossary does not create an attorney-client or legal adviser relationship. If you have specific questions, please consult a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.
This glossary post was last updated: 17th April 2024.
To help you cite our definitions in your bibliography, here is the proper citation layout for the three major formatting styles, with all of the relevant information filled in.
- Page URL:https://dlssolicitors.com/define/remote-possibility/
- Modern Language Association (MLA):Remote Possibility. dlssolicitors.com. DLS Solicitors. May 09 2024 https://dlssolicitors.com/define/remote-possibility/.
- Chicago Manual of Style (CMS):Remote Possibility. dlssolicitors.com. DLS Solicitors. https://dlssolicitors.com/define/remote-possibility/ (accessed: May 09 2024).
- American Psychological Association (APA):Remote Possibility. dlssolicitors.com. Retrieved May 09 2024, from dlssolicitors.com website: https://dlssolicitors.com/define/remote-possibility/
Our team of professionals are based in Alderley Edge, Cheshire. We offer clear, specialist legal advice in all matters relating to Family Law, Wills, Trusts, Probate, Lasting Power of Attorney and Court of Protection.
All author posts