Secondary consideration is a factor that, although not the primary reason for something, still affects it. It is taken into account after the main factors have been considered. For instance, when purchasing a car, primary factors to consider may include the price, make and model, and features. However, secondary considerations could be the car’s color or the dealership’s reputation. While not the most crucial factors, they can still impact the decision.
Secondary considerations are factors that may be taken into account when evaluating the patentability of an invention, even if they are not directly related to the invention itself. These factors include commercial success, long-standing but unresolved needs, and unexpected results. For instance, if a product has achieved significant success in the market, it can be considered as evidence of its novelty and non-obviousness. Similarly, if an invention addresses a long-standing problem in an industry or field, it can support its patentability. Additionally, if an invention produces unexpected or surprising results, it can also contribute to its patentability. These examples demonstrate how secondary considerations can be utilised to support the patentability of an invention, even if the invention itself may not be entirely novel or non-obvious.
Secondary consideration refers to any additional factors or evidence that may be considered in a legal case, beyond the primary evidence or arguments presented by the parties involved.
Common types of secondary considerations include the parties’ conduct, industry standards, market demand, commercial success, long-felt but unresolved needs, and the presence of copying or imitation.
In patent law, secondary considerations are often used to evaluate the non-obviousness or inventiveness of an invention. These considerations can help determine whether an invention has commercial success, industry acceptance, or solves a long-standing problem.
Yes, secondary considerations can be used to rebut a claim of obviousness in patent law. If an invention has achieved significant commercial success or has been widely accepted in the industry, it can demonstrate that the invention was not obvious at the time of its creation.
No, secondary considerations are not always considered in legal cases. Their relevance and weight depend on the specific circumstances of each case and the applicable legal standards.
Secondary considerations can be proven through various means, such as market data, sales figures, expert testimony, industry reports, customer feedback, and other relevant evidence that supports the existence and significance of the secondary considerations.
Yes, secondary considerations can be used in contract disputes. For example, if one party claims that a contract provision is ambiguous, the parties’ conduct and industry practices may be considered as secondary evidence to interpret the contract’s meaning.
Secondary considerations are generally less relevant in criminal cases, as the focus is primarily on proving guilt or innocence based on the evidence presented. However, in some cases, secondary considerations may be relevant to establish motive, intent, or other relevant factors.
Yes, secondary considerations can be used in intellectual property disputes, such as trademark or copyright infringement cases. For example, evidence of consumer confusion or market recognition can support a claim of trademark infringement.
The weight given to secondary considerations varies depending on the specific case and the legal standards applied. In some cases, secondary considerations can be highly influential in determining the outcome, while in others, they may have minimal impact. Ultimately, it is up to the judge or jury to evaluate and weigh the significance of the secondary considerations presented.
This site contains general legal information but does not constitute professional legal advice for your particular situation. Persuing this glossary does not create an attorney-client or legal adviser relationship. If you have specific questions, please consult a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.
This glossary post was last updated: 17th April 2024.
To help you cite our definitions in your bibliography, here is the proper citation layout for the three major formatting styles, with all of the relevant information filled in.
- Page URL:https://dlssolicitors.com/define/secondary-consideration/
- Modern Language Association (MLA):Secondary Consideration. dlssolicitors.com. DLS Solicitors. May 09 2024 https://dlssolicitors.com/define/secondary-consideration/.
- Chicago Manual of Style (CMS):Secondary Consideration. dlssolicitors.com. DLS Solicitors. https://dlssolicitors.com/define/secondary-consideration/ (accessed: May 09 2024).
- American Psychological Association (APA):Secondary Consideration. dlssolicitors.com. Retrieved May 09 2024, from dlssolicitors.com website: https://dlssolicitors.com/define/secondary-consideration/
Our team of professionals are based in Alderley Edge, Cheshire. We offer clear, specialist legal advice in all matters relating to Family Law, Wills, Trusts, Probate, Lasting Power of Attorney and Court of Protection.
All author posts