Self-induced frustration occurs when an individual intentionally prevents themselves from fulfiling their obligations stated in a contract, akin to purposefully breaking a promise. This is distinct from temporary frustration, which arises when an unforeseen event hinders someone from fulfiling their commitments, but they still possess the intention to do so. In the event that an unexpected circumstance obstructs the primary purpose for entering into a contract, the individual may no longer be obligated to uphold their promise. This is referred to as frustration of purpose.
Self-induced frustration refers to a situation where one party’s actions result in a breach of contract by preventing the performance of the agreed-upon obligations. For instance, if a contractor fails to complete a house construction project due to their failure to order the necessary materials, it would be classified as self-induced frustration. In this case, the contractor’s actions hindered the fulfilment of the contract. It is important to note that self-induced frustration is not a distinct form of frustration, but rather a breach of contract. Another example could involve a musician who agrees to perform at a concert but decides to go on vacation instead, thereby failing to show up. This would also be considered self-induced frustration. In summary, self-induced frustration occurs when one party’s actions impede the execution of a contract, resulting in a breach of contract.
Self-induced frustration refers to a situation where an individual intentionally creates obstacles or impediments that prevent the fulfillment of a contractual obligation or legal duty.
No, self-induced frustration is generally not considered a valid defence. Courts are unlikely to excuse a party’s deliberate actions that lead to frustration of a contract or legal obligation.
In most cases, self-induced frustration cannot be used as a defence in a breach of contract case. Parties are expected to fulfill their contractual obligations, and intentionally causing frustration will not excuse non-performance.
The consequences of self-induced frustration can vary depending on the specific circumstances and the applicable laws. However, it is generally not a favorable position for the party responsible, as they may be held liable for any resulting damages or losses.
Self-induced frustration can potentially lead to the termination of a contract if the frustrated party decides to invoke a termination clause or if the other party agrees to terminate the contract due to the intentional actions of the frustrated party.
Yes, the party affected by self-induced frustration may be entitled to seek legal remedies such as damages or specific performance. However, the availability of these remedies will depend on the specific circumstances and the applicable laws.
Self-induced frustration is not typically considered a form of fraud. Fraud generally involves intentional misrepresentation or deceit, whereas self-induced frustration involves intentional actions that hinder the fulfillment of a legal obligation.
Self-induced frustration is unlikely to be a valid defence in a criminal case. Criminal offenses typically require proof of intent or knowledge, and intentionally causing frustration would not absolve a person from criminal liability.
Self-induced frustration is generally not a valid defence in a personal injury case. The injured party may still be entitled to compensation for their injuries, regardless of whether the frustration was self-induced or not.
To avoid self-induced frustration in legal matters, it is important to act in good faith, fulfill contractual obligations, and seek legal advice when facing challenges or disputes. It is also crucial to understand the potential consequences of intentional actions that may lead to frustration.
This site contains general legal information but does not constitute professional legal advice for your particular situation. Persuing this glossary does not create an attorney-client or legal adviser relationship. If you have specific questions, please consult a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.
This glossary post was last updated: 17th April 2024.
To help you cite our definitions in your bibliography, here is the proper citation layout for the three major formatting styles, with all of the relevant information filled in.
- Page URL:https://dlssolicitors.com/define/self-induced-frustration/
- Modern Language Association (MLA):Self-Induced Frustration. dlssolicitors.com. DLS Solicitors. May 09 2024 https://dlssolicitors.com/define/self-induced-frustration/.
- Chicago Manual of Style (CMS):Self-Induced Frustration. dlssolicitors.com. DLS Solicitors. https://dlssolicitors.com/define/self-induced-frustration/ (accessed: May 09 2024).
- American Psychological Association (APA):Self-Induced Frustration. dlssolicitors.com. Retrieved May 09 2024, from dlssolicitors.com website: https://dlssolicitors.com/define/self-induced-frustration/
Our team of professionals are based in Alderley Edge, Cheshire. We offer clear, specialist legal advice in all matters relating to Family Law, Wills, Trusts, Probate, Lasting Power of Attorney and Court of Protection.
All author posts