The phrase originates from Law Latin and signifies that if an event occurs prior to a blow, regardless of its direct connection, it was previously employed to determine the guilt of an individual accused of the grave offence of capital murder.
SI ANTECEDIT ICTUM LICET NON CONGRESSUM is a Latin legal term that refers to the concept of preceding the blow, even if not directly connected to it. This phrase is used in the context of establishing the malice necessary for a capital murder conviction. For instance, if an individual plans to kill someone and purchases a weapon, but never actually uses it to carry out the murder, they can still be charged with capital murder due to their demonstrated malice aforethought. Similarly, if someone hires a hitman to commit a murder, but the hitman does not follow through, the person who hired them can still face capital murder charges. These examples highlight how the intent and actions leading up to a murder, even if the murder itself does not occur, can be used as evidence of malice aforethought and lead to a capital murder conviction.
“Si Antecedit Ictum Licet Non Congressum” is a Latin phrase that translates to “If the blow precedes, it is allowed even if there is no combat.” It refers to the legal principle that allows a person to defend themselves with force if they reasonably believe they are in imminent danger of harm.
Yes, you have the right to use reasonable force to defend yourself if you reasonably believe you are in immediate danger of harm. However, the force used must be proportionate to the threat you are facing.
Reasonable force refers to the amount of force necessary to protect yourself from harm. It should not exceed what is necessary to neutralize the threat. The circumstances surrounding the situation will determine what is considered reasonable.
The use of deadly force is generally only justified if you reasonably believe that you or someone else is in imminent danger of death or serious bodily harm. However, the specific laws regarding the use of deadly force may vary depending on your jurisdiction.
In most cases, you cannot use force to defend your property alone. However, if you reasonably believe that the use of force is necessary to protect yourself or others from harm while defending your property, it may be justified.
While self-defence is a valid legal defence, it does not guarantee immunity from criminal charges. The circumstances surrounding the incident will be evaluated to determine if your use of force was justified. It is important to consult with an attorney if you are facing criminal charges related to self-defence.
Yes, you may use force to defend someone else if you reasonably believe that they are in immediate danger of harm. The same principles of reasonableness and proportionality apply.
Using force against a police officer is generally not advisable, even if you believe they are acting unlawfully. It is best to cooperate with law enforcement and address any concerns through legal channels, such as filing a complaint or seeking legal representation.
While it is possible to be sued for using force in self-defence, the success of such a lawsuit will depend on the specific circumstances and the laws of your jurisdiction. If you acted reasonably and within the bounds of the law, you may have a valid defence against any civil claims.
It is highly recommended to consult with an attorney if you are involved in a self-defence case. An attorney can help you understand the laws in your jurisdiction, guide you through the legal process, and ensure that your rights are protected.
This site contains general legal information but does not constitute professional legal advice for your particular situation. Persuing this glossary does not create an attorney-client or legal adviser relationship. If you have specific questions, please consult a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.
This glossary post was last updated: 16th April 2024.
To help you cite our definitions in your bibliography, here is the proper citation layout for the three major formatting styles, with all of the relevant information filled in.
- Page URL:https://dlssolicitors.com/define/si-antecedit-ictum-licet-non-congressum/
- Modern Language Association (MLA):Si Antecedit Ictum Licet Non Congressum. dlssolicitors.com. DLS Solicitors. May 09 2024 https://dlssolicitors.com/define/si-antecedit-ictum-licet-non-congressum/.
- Chicago Manual of Style (CMS):Si Antecedit Ictum Licet Non Congressum. dlssolicitors.com. DLS Solicitors. https://dlssolicitors.com/define/si-antecedit-ictum-licet-non-congressum/ (accessed: May 09 2024).
- American Psychological Association (APA):Si Antecedit Ictum Licet Non Congressum. dlssolicitors.com. Retrieved May 09 2024, from dlssolicitors.com website: https://dlssolicitors.com/define/si-antecedit-ictum-licet-non-congressum/
Our team of professionals are based in Alderley Edge, Cheshire. We offer clear, specialist legal advice in all matters relating to Family Law, Wills, Trusts, Probate, Lasting Power of Attorney and Court of Protection.
All author posts