Define: Summation

Summation is the final argument made by each side in a trial, where they summarize the evidence presented and attempt to persuade the judge or jury to rule in their favor.

Summation typically occurs after all evidence has been presented and before the judge or jury begins deliberations.

The attorneys for each side deliver their own summation.

The length of a summation can vary, but it is usually limited to a certain amount of time by the judge.

The purpose of summation is to provide a final opportunity for each side to persuade the judge or jury to rule in their favor.

A summation should include a summary of the evidence presented, an explanation of how the evidence supports the side’s argument, and a persuasive argument for why the judge or jury should rule in their favor.

No, new evidence cannot be introduced during summation.

No, the judge or jury cannot ask questions during summation.

Yes, the judge or jury can be influenced by the attorneys’ demeanor during summation.

No, summation is not the final step in a trial. After summation, the judge or jury will deliberate and then render a verdict.