The word “taint” can function as both a noun and a verb. As a noun, it refers to a serious crime conviction or a person who has been convicted of such a crime. As a verb, it denotes the act of adding a harmful substance or quality to make something bad or harmful. It can also describe the action of slightly spoiling or damaging something.
Definition:
Taint, noun. A state of being convicted of a serious crime. An individual who has been found guilty of a serious crime. See ATTAINDER.
Taint, verb. To render something undesirable or harmful by introducing a negative quality or principle. To contaminate or corrupt something. To have a slight negative impact on something.
Examples:
1. Following his embezzlement conviction, he carried the stigma of a criminal for the remainder of his life.
2. The company’s reputation was tarnished by the scandal.
3. The food became contaminated with bacteria, resulting in numerous people falling ill.
4. The politician’s affiliation with a known criminal tainted his campaign.
These examples demonstrate how the term “taint” can refer to a conviction of a serious crime, an individual who has been convicted of a serious crime, or the contamination or corruption of something. In the first example, the person’s conviction taints his reputation. In the second example, the scandal taints the company’s reputation. In the third example, the bacteria taints the food. In the fourth example, the politician’s association with a criminal taints his campaign.
Taint refers to the contamination or spoilage of evidence, making it inadmissible in court.
Evidence can become tainted through mishandling, tampering, or improper collection procedures.
Using tainted evidence in court can result in the evidence being excluded and potentially lead to the dismissal of the case.
In some cases, tainted evidence may still be admissible if the court determines that its probative value outweighs its prejudicial effect.
You can challenge the use of tainted evidence by filing a motion to suppress or exclude the evidence from the trial.
If you suspect evidence has been tainted, you should immediately notify your attorney and discuss the best course of action.
Yes, law enforcement officers can be held accountable for tainting evidence if it can be proven that they acted negligently or intentionally.
Common examples of tainted evidence include contaminated DNA samples, coerced confessions, and illegally obtained search warrants.
To prevent evidence from becoming tainted, it is important to follow proper procedures for collection, handling, and preservation of evidence.
The chain of custody is crucial in preventing taint as it establishes a documented trail of who has had possession of the evidence, ensuring its integrity and admissibility in court.
This site contains general legal information but does not constitute professional legal advice for your particular situation. Persuing this glossary does not create an attorney-client or legal adviser relationship. If you have specific questions, please consult a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.
This glossary post was last updated: 17th April 2024.
To help you cite our definitions in your bibliography, here is the proper citation layout for the three major formatting styles, with all of the relevant information filled in.
- Page URL:https://dlssolicitors.com/define/taint/
- Modern Language Association (MLA):Taint. dlssolicitors.com. DLS Solicitors. May 09 2024 https://dlssolicitors.com/define/taint/.
- Chicago Manual of Style (CMS):Taint. dlssolicitors.com. DLS Solicitors. https://dlssolicitors.com/define/taint/ (accessed: May 09 2024).
- American Psychological Association (APA):Taint. dlssolicitors.com. Retrieved May 09 2024, from dlssolicitors.com website: https://dlssolicitors.com/define/taint/
Our team of professionals are based in Alderley Edge, Cheshire. We offer clear, specialist legal advice in all matters relating to Family Law, Wills, Trusts, Probate, Lasting Power of Attorney and Court of Protection.
All author posts