Legal impossibility occurs when an individual intends to commit a crime, but the action they are attempting to perform is not considered illegal. An example of this would be if someone goes hunting during a time they believe is not hunting season, but it actually is. In such a case, they cannot be charged with a crime as they did not violate any laws. This differs from factual impossibility, which is when an individual is unable to physically carry out the illegal act they intended to commit, such as attempting to pick an empty pocket. Legal impossibility can be used as a defence for the crimes of attempt, conspiracy, and solicitation.
True legal impossibility is a defence used in criminal cases when a person tries to commit a crime that is not actually illegal. This occurs when the person mistakenly believes their actions are against the law, but in reality, they are not. For instance, if someone attempts to purchase drugs from an undercover police officer, but the drugs turn out to be fake, this is considered true legal impossibility. Although the person intended to commit a crime, they cannot be charged with drug possession because the drugs were not real. It is important to distinguish true legal impossibility from factual impossibility, which refers to situations where the illegal act cannot be physically accomplished. Factual impossibility does not serve as a defence to the crime of attempt. In summary, true legal impossibility is a defence applicable in specific criminal cases where the person did not actually commit a crime because the act they attempted was not illegal.
True legal impossibility refers to a situation where an individual attempts to commit a crime, but due to circumstances beyond their control, it is legally impossible to complete the offense. In such cases, the person cannot be held criminally liable.
True legal impossibility is distinct from factual impossibility. Factual impossibility occurs when an individual’s intended crime is impossible to commit due to external factors, such as a mistaken belief or lack of necessary tools. Unlike true legal impossibility, individuals can still be held criminally liable for factual impossibility.
No, if an individual attempts to commit a crime that is legally impossible, they cannot be charged or convicted for that specific offense. The law recognizes that it is unfair to punish someone for an act that was impossible to complete.
Yes, there are certain exceptions where the defence of true legal impossibility may not apply. For example, if the individual’s actions demonstrate a clear intent to commit a crime, even if it was legally impossible, they may still face charges for an inchoate offense, such as attempted conspiracy.
True legal impossibility is distinct from defences like mistake of fact or mistake of law. Mistake of fact occurs when an individual has a genuine belief that certain facts exist, which, if true, would make their actions legal. Mistake of law, on the other hand, involves a misunderstanding or ignorance of the law. True legal impossibility, however, focuses on the inherent impossibility of completing the intended crime.
No, true legal impossibility can only be used as a defence in cases where the impossibility is recognized by law. If the law does not recognize the impossibility, the defence cannot be invoked.
When determining true legal impossibility, courts consider whether the impossibility arises from a legal barrier rather than a factual or physical one. The focus is on whether the law itself renders the intended crime impossible to commit.
Yes, true legal impossibility can be used as a defence for any crime, as long as the impossibility is recognized by law. However, the success of this defence may vary depending on the specific circumstances and jurisdiction.
No, true legal impossibility is not an affirmative defence. It is a defence that challenges the very existence of a crime due to its legal impossibility. Affirmative defences, on the other hand, admit the commission of the crime but provide justifications or excuses for the defendant’s actions.
No, true legal impossibility is a defence specific to criminal cases. In civil cases, different defences and legal principles apply.
This site contains general legal information but does not constitute professional legal advice for your particular situation. Persuing this glossary does not create an attorney-client or legal adviser relationship. If you have specific questions, please consult a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.
This glossary post was last updated: 17th April 2024.
To help you cite our definitions in your bibliography, here is the proper citation layout for the three major formatting styles, with all of the relevant information filled in.
- Page URL:https://dlssolicitors.com/define/true-legal-impossibility/
- Modern Language Association (MLA):True Legal Impossibility. dlssolicitors.com. DLS Solicitors. May 09 2024 https://dlssolicitors.com/define/true-legal-impossibility/.
- Chicago Manual of Style (CMS):True Legal Impossibility. dlssolicitors.com. DLS Solicitors. https://dlssolicitors.com/define/true-legal-impossibility/ (accessed: May 09 2024).
- American Psychological Association (APA):True Legal Impossibility. dlssolicitors.com. Retrieved May 09 2024, from dlssolicitors.com website: https://dlssolicitors.com/define/true-legal-impossibility/
Our team of professionals are based in Alderley Edge, Cheshire. We offer clear, specialist legal advice in all matters relating to Family Law, Wills, Trusts, Probate, Lasting Power of Attorney and Court of Protection.
All author posts