The Two-Controlled-Studies Standard is a regulation established by the Federal Trade Commission. It mandates that in order for a company to make claims about the superiority or reduced side effects of their painkiller compared to another brand, they must provide evidence through conducting two meticulously controlled scientific studies.
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has established the Two-Controlled-Studies Standard for manufacturers of over-the-counter painkillers. This standard mandates that before a company can make claims about their product being superior or having fewer side effects compared to another brand, they must substantiate these claims through two scientifically controlled studies. For instance, if a company wishes to assert that their painkiller is more effective than a competitor’s, they must conduct two studies demonstrating its superior efficacy. These studies must be conducted under controlled conditions, where all variables are kept constant except for the painkiller being tested. Similarly, if a company wants to assert that their painkiller has fewer side effects than a competitor’s, they must conduct two studies showing the reduced side effects. These studies must also be conducted in a controlled environment, with all variables except the painkiller being tested being held constant. The purpose of the Two-Controlled-Studies Standard is to safeguard consumers from misleading advertising claims. By demanding scientific evidence to support advertising claims, the FTC ensures that consumers can make well-informed decisions when purchasing products.
The Two-Controlled-Studies Standard is a legal principle used in certain jurisdictions to determine the admissibility of scientific evidence in court. It requires that the scientific evidence being presented must be supported by at least two independent and controlled studies conducted by different researchers.
The Two-Controlled-Studies Standard is important because it helps ensure the reliability and validity of scientific evidence presented in court. By requiring multiple studies, it reduces the risk of biased or flawed research influencing legal decisions.
No, the Two-Controlled-Studies Standard typically applies to specific types of scientific evidence, such as new or novel scientific theories, treatments, or products. It is not a requirement for all scientific evidence presented in court.
If the scientific evidence fails to meet the Two-Controlled-Studies Standard, it may be deemed inadmissible in court. This means that it cannot be used to support or refute a legal argument or claim.
Yes, there may be exceptions to the Two-Controlled-Studies Standard depending on the jurisdiction and the specific circumstances of the case. Courts may consider other factors, such as the availability of alternative evidence or the consensus within the scientific community, when determining the admissibility of scientific evidence.
To determine if the scientific evidence meets the Two-Controlled-Studies Standard, you should consult with a qualified expert in the relevant field. They can assess the quality and reliability of the studies supporting the evidence and provide an opinion on its admissibility.
Yes, as a party to a legal case, you have the right to challenge the admissibility of scientific evidence based on the Two-Controlled-Studies Standard. You can present arguments and evidence to the court to support your challenge.
Yes, there are alternative standards to the Two-Controlled-Studies Standard, such as the Frye standard or the Daubert standard. These standards vary in their requirements for the admissibility of scientific evidence and may be applicable in different jurisdictions.
The Two-Controlled-Studies Standard is primarily used in scientific fields where empirical evidence is crucial. However, it may not be applicable or necessary in non-scientific fields where evidence is based on other factors, such as witness testimony or legal precedents.
No, the Two-Controlled-Studies Standard is not universally accepted. Different jurisdictions may have different standards for the admissibility of scientific evidence, and some may not require the Two-Controlled-Studies Standard at all. It is important to consult the specific laws and rules of the jurisdiction in question.
This site contains general legal information but does not constitute professional legal advice for your particular situation. Persuing this glossary does not create an attorney-client or legal adviser relationship. If you have specific questions, please consult a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.
This glossary post was last updated: 16th April 2024.
To help you cite our definitions in your bibliography, here is the proper citation layout for the three major formatting styles, with all of the relevant information filled in.
- Page URL:https://dlssolicitors.com/define/two-controlled-studies-standard/
- Modern Language Association (MLA):Two-Controlled-Studies Standard. dlssolicitors.com. DLS Solicitors. May 09 2024 https://dlssolicitors.com/define/two-controlled-studies-standard/.
- Chicago Manual of Style (CMS):Two-Controlled-Studies Standard. dlssolicitors.com. DLS Solicitors. https://dlssolicitors.com/define/two-controlled-studies-standard/ (accessed: May 09 2024).
- American Psychological Association (APA):Two-Controlled-Studies Standard. dlssolicitors.com. Retrieved May 09 2024, from dlssolicitors.com website: https://dlssolicitors.com/define/two-controlled-studies-standard/
Our team of professionals are based in Alderley Edge, Cheshire. We offer clear, specialist legal advice in all matters relating to Family Law, Wills, Trusts, Probate, Lasting Power of Attorney and Court of Protection.
All author posts