Define: Uncodified

Quick Summary of Uncodified

Uncodified principles are not written in laws, but are based on common practices and traditions. They exist because people have always followed them, rather than being written in a book or set of rules. Sometimes, uncodified principles are completely unwritten and not recorded anywhere.

What is the dictionary definition of Uncodified?
Dictionary Definition of Uncodified

Uncodified refers to something that is not written down in a law or statute but exists solely through the common law. It can also encompass principles that have no written documentation at all. For instance, the presumption of innocence in criminal cases is an uncodified principle that is widely accepted and followed in the legal system, despite not being written down in any law. Similarly, the concept of parliamentary sovereignty in the UK is not documented in a single document but is derived from various laws and traditions. The common law system itself is another example of uncodified, as it is not contained in a specific law but is instead based on centuries of court decisions and legal traditions. These examples demonstrate how principles and systems can exist without being written down in a specific law or statute, relying instead on common law, court decisions, and traditions.

Full Definition Of Uncodified

An uncodified constitution, unlike a codified one, is not written in a single, consolidated document. Instead, it is formed by a collection of various sources, including statutes, conventions, judicial decisions, and historical documents. This legal overview explores the characteristics, advantages, disadvantages, and examples of uncodified constitutions, with a particular focus on the United Kingdom, which is the most prominent example of such a system.

Characteristics of Uncodified Constitutions

An uncodified constitution is distinguished by several key characteristics:

  1. Multiplicity of Sources: The constitution is derived from a variety of sources rather than a single, written document.
  2. Flexibility: The absence of a rigid, written framework allows for greater adaptability and evolution over time.
  3. Historical Evolution: An uncodified constitution typically evolves organically over a long period of time, reflecting historical changes and societal developments.
  4. Legal and Non-Legal Elements: It includes both legal sources, such as statutes and case law, and non-legal sources, such as conventions and customs.
  5. Lack of Entrenchment: Constitutional laws are not necessarily superior to other laws and can be amended or repealed by ordinary legislative procedures.

Sources of an Uncodified Constitution

The main sources of an uncodified constitution include:

  1. Statute Law: Acts of Parliament or equivalent legislative bodies that contribute to the constitutional framework.
  2. Common Law: Judicial decisions and precedents that interpret and apply constitutional principles.
  3. Constitutional Conventions: Established practices and norms that, although not legally binding, guide political conduct.
  4. Works of Authority: Authoritative texts and writings by constitutional scholars that provide interpretation and guidance on constitutional matters.
  5. Historical Documents: foundational documents such as the Magna Carta, the Bill of Rights (1689), and the Act of Union (1707).

Advantages of Uncodified Constitutions

  1. Flexibility: One of the primary advantages of an uncodified constitution is its ability to adapt to changing circumstances without the need for complex amendment processes.
  2. Evolutionary Nature: It evolves gradually, incorporating historical developments and societal changes, which can lead to a more mature and stable political system.
  3. Pragmatism: An uncodified constitution can be more practical, avoiding the rigidity that may come with a written constitution.
  4. Resilience: The diverse sources of an uncodified constitution can make it more resilient to sudden political changes or upheavals.

Disadvantages of Uncodified Constitutions

  1. Uncertainty and Ambiguity: The lack of a single, authoritative document can lead to uncertainty and differing interpretations of constitutional principles.
  2. Lack of Clarity: It can be less clear to the public and less accessible for understanding the fundamental laws and principles governing the country.
  3. Potential for Abuse: The flexibility and lack of entrenchment can make it easier for those in power to manipulate constitutional rules for their own benefit.
  4. Inconsistency: The piecemeal nature of an uncodified constitution can lead to inconsistencies and contradictions within the legal system.

The United Kingdom: A Case Study

The United Kingdom (UK) is the most notable example of a country with an uncodified constitution. Its constitutional framework is based on the interplay of several sources, including:

  1. Statute Law: Key statutes include the Magna Carta (1215), the Bill of Rights (1689), and the Human Rights Act (1998). These laws lay down fundamental rights and principles.
  2. Common Law: Judicial decisions, such as those from the House of Lords (now the Supreme Court), contribute significantly to the constitutional framework.
  3. Constitutional Conventions: Practices like the Prime Minister being a member of the House of Commons and the Monarch’s role in granting Royal Assent to legislation are guided by conventions.
  4. Works of Authority: Texts such as A.V. Dicey’s “Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution” provide interpretative guidance on constitutional matters.
  5. Historical Documents: Documents like the Acts of Union 1707, which united England and Scotland, and subsequent acts that shaped the UK’s constitutional arrangement.

Statute Law

Statute law plays a crucial role in the UK constitution. Significant statutes include:

  • Magna Carta (1215): Often regarded as the foundation of constitutional liberty in the UK, it established principles like the rule of law and habeas corpus.
  • Bill of Rights (1689): This established the supremacy of Parliament over the Monarch and laid down key rights and liberties.
  • Parliament Acts (1911 and 1949): These acts reduced the powers of the House of Lords, emphasising the supremacy of the elected House of Commons.
  • The Human Rights Act (1998) incorporates the European Convention on Human Rights into UK law, significantly affecting constitutional interpretation.

Common Law

Common law, developed through judicial decisions, is another pillar of the UK’s uncodified constitution. Courts interpret statutes and apply common law principles, ensuring that laws evolve in response to new challenges. Key cases include:

  • Entick v. Carrington (1765) established the principle that government officials cannot act beyond their authority.
  • Factortame (1990): Demonstrated the supremacy of European Union law over UK law, significantly affecting constitutional arrangements before Brexit.

Constitutional Conventions

Constitutional conventions, though not legally enforceable, play a critical role in the UK constitution. Examples include:

  • Prime Minister’s Role: It is a convention that the Prime Minister must be a member of the House of Commons.
  • Royal Assent: The Monarch’s approval of legislation passed by Parliament is a convention, with the last refusal occurring in 1708.
  • Collective Ministerial Responsibility: Members of the Cabinet must publicly support all governmental decisions or resign.

Works of Authority

Works of authority provide interpretative guidance. Key texts include:

  • A.V. Dicey’s “Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution”: Explains the principles of parliamentary sovereignty and the rule of law.
  • Erskine May’s “Parliamentary Practice”: An authoritative guide to the practices and procedures of Parliament.

Historical Documents

Historical documents form an essential part of the UK constitution.

  • Act of Union (1707): United the Parliaments of England and Scotland, forming the Kingdom of Great Britain.
  • Act of Settlement (1701): Established the succession to the English and Irish crowns, impacting the constitutional arrangement.

Comparison with Codified Constitutions

A comparison with codified constitutions, such as that of the United States, highlights the distinctiveness of an uncodified system.

  • Flexibility vs. Rigidity: Codified constitutions tend to be more rigid, with formal amendment procedures. The US Constitution, for instance, requires a two-thirds majority in both Houses of Congress and ratification by three-quarters of the states for amendments.
  • Clarity and Accessibility: Codified constitutions provide a clear, accessible reference point for citizens and officials. The US Constitution is a single document outlining fundamental rights and governmental structure.
  • Judicial Interpretation: In codified systems, courts play a critical role in interpreting the written constitution. Landmark cases like Marbury v. Madison (1803) established judicial review in the US, allowing courts to strike down unconstitutional laws.

Challenges and Reforms

The uncodified nature of the UK constitution presents several challenges and areas for potential reform:

  • Calls for Codification: There have been periodic calls to codify the UK constitution to provide greater clarity and stability.
  • Human Rights Protection: The incorporation of the European Convention on Human Rights via the Human Rights Act 1998 has enhanced rights protection, but its future post-Brexit remains uncertain.
  • Devolution: The devolution of powers to Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland has added complexity to the UK’s constitutional arrangement, raising questions about federalism and the potential for further devolution or even independence movements.
  • Judicial Independence: Maintaining the independence of the judiciary in interpreting constitutional matters is crucial, especially in light of political pressures.


Uncodified constitutions, exemplified by the United Kingdom, offer a unique approach to governance, blending historical evolution with contemporary adaptability. While they provide flexibility and resilience, they also face challenges related to clarity, consistency, and potential for abuse. Understanding the multifaceted nature of an uncodified constitution is essential for appreciating its strengths and addressing its weaknesses, ensuring it continues to serve its purpose in an ever-changing political landscape.

Uncodified FAQ'S

When a law is uncodified, it means that it has not been organised and compiled into a single, comprehensive statute or code. Instead, it may exist in various forms, such as court decisions, administrative regulations, or constitutional provisions.

Yes, uncodified laws are still enforceable. They hold the same legal weight as codified laws and can be used as a basis for legal actions and decisions.

Uncodified laws can be found in various legal sources, such as case law databases, administrative agency websites, or official government publications. Consulting legal professionals or conducting thorough legal research can help locate specific uncodified laws.

Yes, uncodified laws can be changed or repealed through the same legislative or judicial processes as codified laws. However, the process may vary depending on the specific nature of the uncodified law.

No, uncodified laws are not inherently less important than codified laws. Both types of laws carry legal significance and can have a significant impact on various legal matters.

Yes, uncodified laws can sometimes conflict with codified laws. In such cases, courts may need to interpret and reconcile the conflicting provisions to determine the appropriate legal outcome.

Yes, uncodified laws can be challenged in court if they are believed to be unconstitutional, inconsistent with other laws, or in violation of individual rights. The court will then evaluate the merits of the challenge based on legal principles and precedents.

Yes, like any other law, uncodified laws are subject to interpretation by courts and legal professionals. The interpretation process involves analyzing the language, intent, and context of the law to determine its meaning and application.

Yes, uncodified laws can be used as a defence in legal cases if they are relevant and support the defendant’s position. However, their effectiveness will depend on the specific circumstances and the court’s interpretation of the law.

Generally, uncodified laws cannot be applied retroactively unless explicitly stated or required by the law itself. Retroactive application of laws is generally disfavored and may infringe upon individuals’ rights and expectations.

Related Phrases
No related content found.

This site contains general legal information but does not constitute professional legal advice for your particular situation. Persuing this glossary does not create an attorney-client or legal adviser relationship. If you have specific questions, please consult a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.

This glossary post was last updated: 10th June 2024.

Cite Term

To help you cite our definitions in your bibliography, here is the proper citation layout for the three major formatting styles, with all of the relevant information filled in.

  • Page URL:
  • Modern Language Association (MLA):Uncodified. DLS Solicitors. June 16 2024
  • Chicago Manual of Style (CMS):Uncodified. DLS Solicitors. (accessed: June 16 2024).
  • American Psychological Association (APA):Uncodified. Retrieved June 16 2024, from website:
Avatar of DLS Solicitors
DLS Solicitors : Family Law Solicitors

Our team of professionals are based in Alderley Edge, Cheshire. We offer clear, specialist legal advice in all matters relating to Family Law, Wills, Trusts, Probate, Lasting Power of Attorney and Court of Protection.

All author posts