Utiliter et equivalenter refers to the act of performing a task correctly and with equal consequences. This phrase originated from Law Latin and was previously employed to emphasize the significance of executing actions accurately and impartially. It signifies that when we engage in an activity, we should ensure that it is done in the appropriate manner and has an equitable impact on all parties involved.
Utiliter et equivalenter is a Latin legal term that signifies “duly and with equal effect.” When both parties sign a contract, it is deemed to have been executed utiliter et equivalenter. Similarly, when a judge issues a ruling that is binding on both parties, it is considered to have been done utiliter et equivalenter. These instances exemplify the usage of the term in legal contexts, indicating that something has been carried out correctly and with equal impact for all parties concerned. In both scenarios, the actions taken are regarded as fair and just, and are binding on all parties involved.
“Utiliter Et Equivalenter” is a Latin phrase that translates to “usefully and equivalently” in English. It is often used in legal contexts to refer to a principle or standard that requires actions or decisions to be both useful and equivalent in their outcomes.
The principle of “Utiliter Et Equivalenter” is applied by evaluating the usefulness and equivalence of different actions or decisions in achieving a desired outcome. It helps ensure that the chosen course of action is not only effective but also fair and equitable.
For example, in a personal injury case, the principle of “Utiliter Et Equivalenter” may be applied to determine the appropriate amount of compensation for the injured party. The court will consider both the usefulness of the compensation in addressing the victim’s needs and the equivalence of the compensation to the harm suffered.
“Utiliter Et Equivalenter” is not a universally recognized legal principle, but it is often used in legal systems influenced by Roman law, such as civil law jurisdictions. Its application may vary depending on the specific legal system and jurisdiction.
“Utiliter Et Equivalenter” differs from other legal principles in that it emphasizes both usefulness and equivalence. While some legal principles may focus solely on achieving a desired outcome, “Utiliter Et Equivalenter” requires a balance between effectiveness and fairness.
The application of “Utiliter Et Equivalenter” may be subject to limitations based on the specific circumstances of a case and the legal system in which it is being applied. The interpretation and application of the principle may vary, and it is ultimately up to the courts or legal authorities to determine its scope and limitations.
“Utiliter Et Equivalenter” is primarily used as a guiding principle for decision-making rather than a standalone defence. However, it may be invoked to argue that a particular action or decision is both useful and equivalent in achieving a desired outcome, thereby justifying its legality or appropriateness.
The principle of “Utiliter Et Equivalenter” shares similarities with the concept of proportionality in law. Both principles require a balance between the means employed and the ends sought. However, “Utiliter Et Equivalenter” specifically emphasizes the usefulness and equivalence of actions or decisions, while proportionality may consider other factors such as necessity and reasonableness.
In some cases, other legal principles or considerations may take precedence over the principle of “Utiliter Et Equivalenter.” For example, if a specific statute or constitutional provision conflicts with the principle, the court may prioritize the application of that law over “Utiliter Et Equivalenter.”
To ensure the appropriate application of “Utiliter Et Equivalenter” in your legal case, it is advisable to consult with an experienced attorney who is familiar with the legal system and principles of your jurisdiction. They can provide guidance on how to effectively argue for the application of the principle and navigate any potential limitations or conflicts.
This site contains general legal information but does not constitute professional legal advice for your particular situation. Persuing this glossary does not create an attorney-client or legal adviser relationship. If you have specific questions, please consult a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.
This glossary post was last updated: 17th April 2024.
To help you cite our definitions in your bibliography, here is the proper citation layout for the three major formatting styles, with all of the relevant information filled in.
- Page URL:https://dlssolicitors.com/define/utiliter-et-equivalenter/
- Modern Language Association (MLA):Utiliter Et Equivalenter. dlssolicitors.com. DLS Solicitors. May 09 2024 https://dlssolicitors.com/define/utiliter-et-equivalenter/.
- Chicago Manual of Style (CMS):Utiliter Et Equivalenter. dlssolicitors.com. DLS Solicitors. https://dlssolicitors.com/define/utiliter-et-equivalenter/ (accessed: May 09 2024).
- American Psychological Association (APA):Utiliter Et Equivalenter. dlssolicitors.com. Retrieved May 09 2024, from dlssolicitors.com website: https://dlssolicitors.com/define/utiliter-et-equivalenter/
Our team of professionals are based in Alderley Edge, Cheshire. We offer clear, specialist legal advice in all matters relating to Family Law, Wills, Trusts, Probate, Lasting Power of Attorney and Court of Protection.
All author posts