Define: Zambrano

Quick Summary of Zambrano

The Zambrano case, which spanned from 1988 to 2002, involved undocumented aliens who contested I.N.S. regulations that limited their access to government aid programs. Although the case reached the U.S. Supreme Court in 1993, the plaintiffs’ claims were ultimately dismissed due to jurisdictional issues and other obstacles. However, Zambrano, along with other immigration cases, led to the enactment of Section 1104 of the LIFE Act. This provision allowed certain immigrants involved in Zambrano and other specified class actions to qualify for permanent resident status if they met specific requirements. For instance, Maria, an undocumented immigrant, was unable to receive government aid for her children’s education due to I.N.S. regulations. To challenge these regulations and fight for her rights, she joined the Zambrano class action case. Maria’s situation exemplifies the problem that the Zambrano case aimed to address. Undocumented immigrants like Maria faced unfair restrictions in accessing government aid programs, and the case sought to challenge these regulations and expand eligibility for such programs.

What is the dictionary definition of Zambrano?
Dictionary Definition of Zambrano

The Zambrano case, which spanned from 1988 to 2002, revolved around undocumented individuals seeking government assistance but facing challenging regulations. Despite reaching the Supreme Court, the claims of the people involved were ultimately rejected. As a result of this case and similar ones, a new law was enacted to aid specific immigrants in obtaining permanent residency, provided they fulfilled certain criteria.

Full Definition Of Zambrano

The Zambrano principle is a significant development in European Union (EU) law, particularly in the context of the rights of non-EU nationals. It originates from the landmark decision in the case of Gerardo Ruiz Zambrano v Office national de l’emploi (ONEm) (C-34/09) by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in 2011. This case has had profound implications for the rights of third-country nationals residing in the EU, especially concerning their right to reside and work within the EU when they are the primary caregivers of EU citizen children.


The Zambrano case revolved around Mr Gerardo Ruiz Zambrano, a Colombian national who, along with his wife, entered Belgium and sought asylum. Despite having their asylum claims rejected, the Zambranos remained in Belgium and had two children who acquired Belgian nationality by birth, thus becoming EU citizens.

The critical legal issue in the Zambrano case was whether Mr Zambrano, a non-EU national, had the right to reside and work in Belgium under his Belgian children’s EU citizenship. The decision hinged on the interpretation of Articles 20 and 21 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), which pertain to the rights of EU citizens.

The CJEU Decision

The CJEU ruled in favour of Mr Zambrano, establishing a principle that has since been referred to as the “Zambrano principle”. The court held that EU law precludes national measures that have the effect of depriving EU citizens of the genuine enjoyment of the substance of the rights conferred by their status as EU citizens. In essence, the court determined that denying Mr Zambrano the right to reside and work in Belgium would force his EU citizen children to leave the EU territory, thus depriving them of their rights as EU citizens.

Key Legal Principles

  1. The Substance of Rights Doctrine: The Zambrano ruling introduced the concept that EU citizens should not be deprived of the genuine enjoyment of the substance of the rights associated with their citizenship. This principle ensures that EU citizens can live and remain in the EU with their family members, even if those family members are non-EU nationals.
  2. Derivative Rights: The rights granted to non-EU nationals under the Zambrano principle are derivative of the rights of their EU citizen family members. In this context, the rights of the non-EU national are contingent upon their role as the primary caregiver to an EU citizen.
  3. Children’s Rights: The Zambrano decision places significant emphasis on the rights and welfare of children who are EU citizens. It underscores the importance of ensuring that these children can exercise their rights fully, which includes the right to reside in the EU with their primary caregivers.

Implications of the Zambrano Principle

The Zambrano principle has had far-reaching implications for immigration and family law within the EU. Some of the key implications include:

  1. Right to Reside and Work: Non-EU nationals who are primary caregivers to EU citizen children have the right to reside and work in the host EU member state. This is to ensure that the EU citizen children can remain within the EU and enjoy their rights.
  2. Impact on National Legislation: The Zambrano ruling has required many EU member states to amend their national laws and policies to comply with this principle. National immigration authorities must consider the rights of EU citizen children when making decisions about the residency and employment of their non-EU national caregivers.
  3. Judicial Interpretation: National courts across the EU have had to interpret and apply the Zambrano principle in various cases, leading to a body of case law that further refines and elaborates on the principle.

Subsequent Developments and Case Law

Since the Zambrano decision, several cases have further clarified and expanded the scope of the principle. Notable cases include:

  1. Dereci and Others v Bundesministerium für Inneres (C-256/11): This case involved several third-country nationals who were family members of EU citizens. The CJEU held that the Zambrano principle applies only in situations where the EU citizen would be compelled to leave the EU if the non-EU national were denied residency.
  2. Chavez-Vilchez and Others v Raad van bestuur van de Sociale verzekeringsbank and Others (C-133/15): This case concerned third-country national mothers of Dutch children. The CJEU ruled that national authorities must consider the dependency of the EU citizen child on the third-country national parent, and the best interests of the child must be a primary consideration.
  3. K.A. and Others v Belgium (C-82/16): The CJEU reiterated that the Zambrano principle applies in circumstances where there is a relationship of dependency between the EU citizen child and the third-country national parent that would compel the child to leave the EU if the parent were denied residence.

Criticisms and Limitations

Despite its broad implications, the Zambrano principle has faced criticisms and limitations:

  1. Restrictive Application: Some critics argue that the principle is applied too restrictively by national authorities, limiting its potential benefits. For instance, authorities may impose stringent requirements on proving dependency or the necessity of the non-EU national’s presence.
  2. Complexity and Uncertainty: The application of the Zambrano principle has led to legal complexity and uncertainty. Determining whether a case falls within the scope of the principle can be challenging, leading to inconsistent interpretations and applications across different member states.
  3. Impact on National Sovereignty: The principle has raised concerns about its impact on national sovereignty, as it limits the ability of member states to control their immigration policies. Some argue that it undermines the autonomy of national governments in making decisions about residency and employment rights for non-EU nationals.


The Zambrano principle represents a significant advancement in EU law, ensuring that EU citizens, particularly children, can fully enjoy their rights by allowing their non-EU national caregivers to reside and work within the EU. It underscores the importance of family unity and the rights of EU citizens, particularly vulnerable children.

While the principle has been transformative, it also poses challenges in terms of its implementation and interpretation. The evolving body of case law continues to shape and refine the application of the Zambrano principle, balancing the rights of EU citizens with the sovereignty of member states.

In summary, the Zambrano principle is a testament to the dynamic nature of EU law, reflecting the EU’s commitment to protecting the rights of its citizens while navigating the complexities of immigration and family law. As member states continue to adapt to this principle, its impact on the legal landscape of the EU will undoubtedly remain significant.

Zambrano FAQ'S

The Zambrano case refers to a landmark European Court of Justice ruling that established the right of non-EU parents of EU citizen children to reside and work in the EU member state where their children reside.

Non-EU parents of EU citizen children who are dependent on their parents and would be forced to leave the EU if their parents were not allowed to reside and work in the EU member state.

You can apply for Zambrano rights by submitting an application to the immigration authorities of the EU member state where your EU citizen child resides.

You will typically need to provide proof of your relationship to the EU citizen child, evidence of the child’s dependency on you, and any other relevant documentation requested by the immigration authorities.

Yes, Zambrano rights allow you to reside and work in the EU member state where your EU citizen child resides.

Zambrano rights only apply to non-EU parents of EU citizen children, so they do not extend to non-EU spouses.

Zambrano rights can be revoked if the EU citizen child no longer resides in the EU member state, or if the child is no longer dependent on the non-EU parent.

Some EU member states may allow you to apply for permanent residency after a certain period of time residing in the country under Zambrano rights.

Zambrano rights only apply to the specific EU member state where your EU citizen child resides, so you may need to apply for a visa or residence permit to travel to other EU member states.

Zambrano rights do not automatically lead to citizenship, but some EU member states may have pathways to citizenship for individuals who have resided in the country for a certain period of time under Zambrano rights.

Related Phrases
No related content found.

This site contains general legal information but does not constitute professional legal advice for your particular situation. Persuing this glossary does not create an attorney-client or legal adviser relationship. If you have specific questions, please consult a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.

This glossary post was last updated: 9th June 2024.

Cite Term

To help you cite our definitions in your bibliography, here is the proper citation layout for the three major formatting styles, with all of the relevant information filled in.

  • Page URL:
  • Modern Language Association (MLA):Zambrano. DLS Solicitors. June 16 2024
  • Chicago Manual of Style (CMS):Zambrano. DLS Solicitors. (accessed: June 16 2024).
  • American Psychological Association (APA):Zambrano. Retrieved June 16 2024, from website:
Avatar of DLS Solicitors
DLS Solicitors : Family Law Solicitors

Our team of professionals are based in Alderley Edge, Cheshire. We offer clear, specialist legal advice in all matters relating to Family Law, Wills, Trusts, Probate, Lasting Power of Attorney and Court of Protection.

All author posts