Define: Abortive Trial

Abortive Trial
Abortive Trial
Quick Summary of Abortive Trial

An abortive trial refers to a legal proceeding that is terminated or discontinued before reaching a final judgement or verdict. This can occur for various reasons, such as procedural errors, misconduct by the parties involved, or the discovery of new evidence that significantly impacts the case. Abortive trials can be costly and time-consuming, as they require the parties to invest resources in preparing for trial only to have the proceedings halted. In such cases, the court may dismiss the case without prejudice, allowing the plaintiff to refile the lawsuit at a later date, or with prejudice, preventing the plaintiff from bringing the same claim again. The decision to abort a trial is typically made by the judge overseeing the case, who considers the interests of justice and fairness to all parties involved.

What is the dictionary definition of Abortive Trial?
Dictionary Definition of Abortive Trial

Abortive Trial:


1. A legal proceeding that is terminated prematurely or inconclusively due to unforeseen circumstances, procedural errors, or the inability to reach a verdict.

2. A failed attempt to conduct a trial, often resulting from the inability to impanel a jury, the disqualification of a judge, or the unavailability of key witnesses.

3. A trial that is discontinued before its completion, typically due to the discovery of new evidence, a change in legal strategy, or the agreement of both parties involved.

4. A legal process that is rendered ineffective or nullified due to a fundamental flaw or irregularity, such as a violation of the defendant’s rights, the introduction of prejudicial evidence, or the misconduct of legal professionals.

Example sentence: The defence attorney successfully argued for an abortive trial after it was revealed that crucial evidence had been mishandled by the prosecution.

Full Definition Of Abortive Trial

An abortive trial, often referred to as a mistrial, is a significant event in the British legal system. It occurs when a trial is invalidated before a verdict is reached, necessitating a retrial. This overview aims to explore the legal framework, causes, consequences, and procedural aspects of abortive trials within the context of British law.

Definition and Legal Framework

An abortive trial, under British law, is one where the proceedings are terminated without a verdict due to a fundamental error or event that compromises the trial’s fairness. The legal framework governing abortive trials is rooted in ensuring the integrity of the judicial process and protecting the rights of the defendant.

The primary sources of law include:

  • Common Law: Principles developed through judicial decisions.
  • Statutory Law: Provisions under various statutes such as the Criminal Procedure Rules and the Contempt of Court Act 1981.
  • Human Rights Legislation: Particularly the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), which influences domestic law through the Human Rights Act 1998.

Causes of Abortive Trials

Abortive trials can arise from various situations, broadly categorised into procedural errors, jury issues, and external influences.

Procedural Errors

    • Judicial Errors: Mistakes made by the judge, such as incorrect legal instructions to the jury or inappropriate handling of evidence.
    • Prosecution or Defence Misconduct: Actions like non-disclosure of evidence, presenting inadmissible evidence, or improper arguments.

Jury Issues

    • Jury Misconduct: Instances where jurors engage in inappropriate behaviour, such as discussing the case outside the courtroom or using social media to research the case.
    • Jury Tampering: Attempts to influence the jury through bribery, threats, or other forms of coercion.

External Influences

    • Media Coverage: Prejudicial media reporting that could bias the jury.
    • Public Disorder: Situations where public demonstrations or disturbances impact the trial’s conduct.

Legal Principles Governing Abortive Trials

The legal principles underpinning abortive trials focus on maintaining justice and ensuring fair trial standards.

  1. Fair Trial: Under Article 6 of the ECHR, the right to a fair trial is paramount. An abortive trial is often declared to safeguard this right.
  2. Double Jeopardy: Historically, the principle of double jeopardy prevented retrials; however, reforms under the Criminal Justice Act 2003 allow retrials in certain serious cases.
  3. Judicial Discretion: Judges have significant discretion in declaring a mistrial, guided by the need to uphold justice and the specifics of each case.

Procedural Aspects

When a trial becomes abortive, specific procedures are followed to ensure proper legal handling.

Declaration of Mistrial

  • A mistrial can be declared by the judge on their initiative or upon a motion by the prosecution or defence.
  • The reasons for declaring a mistrial must be clearly stated on the record.

Post-Mistrial Procedures

  • Immediate Actions: Discharge of the jury and adjournment of the trial.
  • Documentation: Recording the reasons and circumstances of the mistrial.
  • Decision on Retrial: Assessing whether a retrial is feasible and appropriate, considering factors such as the severity of the offence and the interests of justice.

Retrial Considerations

  • Scheduling: Setting a new trial date, which involves logistical coordination and legal preparations.
  • Jury Selection: Ensuring an unbiased jury for the retrial, often with more rigorous vetting processes.

Consequences of Abortive Trials

The declaration of a mistrial has several implications for the judicial process, the defendant, the prosecution, and the public.

Judicial Resources

  • Abortive trials consume significant judicial resources, including time, personnel, and financial costs.
  • Repeated mistrials can strain the legal system and impact the scheduling of other cases.

Impact on Defendants

  • Stress and Uncertainty: Prolonged legal proceedings can cause significant stress and uncertainty for defendants.
  • Pre-Trial Detention: Defendants in custody may face extended detention periods awaiting retrial.

Impact on Victims and Witnesses

  • Emotional Toll: Victims and witnesses may experience emotional distress from repeated appearances and prolonged uncertainty.
  • Witness Availability: Ensuring the availability and reliability of witnesses for the retrial can be challenging.

Public Perception and Confidence

  • Abortive trials can affect public confidence in the legal system, particularly if perceived as frequent or unjustified.
  • Transparency in handling mistrials and clear communication from the judiciary can help mitigate negative perceptions.

Case Studies and Precedents

Examining notable cases provides insights into the practical application and implications of abortive trials.

R v. Young (1995)

  • In this case, a juror used an Ouija board to communicate with the deceased victim, leading to a mistrial. The court ruled this as juror misconduct, necessitating a retrial.

R v. Mullen (2000)

  • The case involved significant procedural errors, including non-disclosure of evidence by the prosecution, resulting in the trial being declared abortive.

R v. West (1996)

  • Media coverage influenced the jury, leading to concerns about impartiality. The trial was declared abortive to ensure a fair retrial.

Legal Reforms and Future Directions

The British legal system continually evolves to address challenges related to abortive trials.

Legislative Reforms

  • Criminal Justice Act 2003: This act introduced provisions allowing retrials in serious cases, even after an acquittal, under specific circumstances.
  • Criminal Procedure Rules: Ongoing updates to these rules aim to streamline procedures and minimise the risk of abortive trials.

Judicial Training

  • Enhanced training for judges on managing trials and avoiding errors that could lead to mistrials.
  • Emphasis on understanding and mitigating jury-related issues and external influences.

Technological Integration

  • Use of technology to monitor jury behaviour and secure trial proceedings.
  • Digital evidence management systems to ensure proper disclosure and handling of evidence.

Public Engagement

  • Initiatives to educate the public about the legal process and the reasons for mistrials.
  • Encouraging responsible media reporting to prevent prejudicial influences on trials.


Abortive trials are a critical aspect of the British legal system, reflecting the balance between safeguarding fair trial rights and ensuring judicial efficiency. Understanding the causes, legal principles, and procedural aspects of abortive trials is essential for legal professionals and the public alike. Continuous reforms and advancements in the judicial process aim to reduce the incidence of mistrials while maintaining the integrity and fairness of the legal system.

Related Phrases
No related content found.

This site contains general legal information but does not constitute professional legal advice for your particular situation. Persuing this glossary does not create an attorney-client or legal adviser relationship. If you have specific questions, please consult a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.

This glossary post was last updated: 9th June 2024.

Cite Term

To help you cite our definitions in your bibliography, here is the proper citation layout for the three major formatting styles, with all of the relevant information filled in.

  • Page URL:
  • Modern Language Association (MLA):Abortive Trial. DLS Solicitors. June 12 2024
  • Chicago Manual of Style (CMS):Abortive Trial. DLS Solicitors. (accessed: June 12 2024).
  • American Psychological Association (APA):Abortive Trial. Retrieved June 12 2024, from website:
Avatar of DLS Solicitors
DLS Solicitors : Family Law Solicitors

Our team of professionals are based in Alderley Edge, Cheshire. We offer clear, specialist legal advice in all matters relating to Family Law, Wills, Trusts, Probate, Lasting Power of Attorney and Court of Protection.

All author posts