Define: Absolute Discretion

Absolute Discretion
Absolute Discretion
Quick Summary of Absolute Discretion

Absolute discretion refers to the complete and unrestricted authority given to a person or entity to make decisions or take actions without any limitations or guidelines. In legal terms, it means that the decision-maker has the power to exercise their judgement and make choices based on their own personal preferences or beliefs without being bound by any external factors or legal requirements.

Absolute discretion is often granted in contractual agreements or legal documents, where one party gives the other party the freedom to act as they see fit without any obligation to provide reasons or justifications for their decisions. This can be seen in situations where a trustee is given absolute discretion to distribute assets from a trust or when a company’s board of directors has absolute discretion to make business decisions.

However, it is important to note that absolute discretion does not mean that the decision-maker can act arbitrarily or unfairly. They still have a duty to exercise their discretion in good faith and in accordance with any applicable laws or regulations. Courts may intervene if it is found that the exercise of absolute discretion was done in bad faith, was irrational, or breached any legal obligations.

In summary, absolute discretion grants complete freedom and authority to a decision-maker, allowing them to make choices without any limitations or guidelines. However, this power must be exercised in good faith and within the boundaries of the law.

What is the dictionary definition of Absolute Discretion?
Dictionary Definition of Absolute Discretion

Absolute Discretion:

Noun. The unrestricted authority or power granted to an individual or entity to make decisions or take actions without any external influence, interference, or limitations. It implies complete freedom and autonomy in exercising judgement, often in matters of great importance or sensitivity. Absolute discretion allows the holder to act independently, without being bound by rules, regulations, or guidelines, and to maintain confidentiality and privacy in their decision-making process. It is typically granted to individuals in positions of high trust, such as judges, executives, or government officials, and is expected to be exercised responsibly and ethically.

Full Definition Of Absolute Discretion

In the realm of law, the term “absolute discretion” is pivotal, carrying significant implications across various legal contexts. At its core, absolute discretion refers to the unqualified authority granted to a person or entity to make decisions or take actions without being bound by external constraints or needing to justify the decisions made. This overview aims to provide a comprehensive examination of absolute discretion, its applications, limitations, and judicial perspectives within the British legal system.

Definition and Conceptual Framework

Absolute discretion can be defined as the power conferred upon an individual or body to make decisions based on their own judgment without any mandatory procedural requirements or substantive constraints. This discretion is often provided by statutory provisions, contractual agreements, or judicial precedents, giving the holder a broad scope of authority.

Applications of Absolute Discretion

  • Contractual Agreements In contractual contexts, absolute discretion is frequently encountered. Parties to a contract may confer upon one another, or a third party, the authority to make decisions that are binding on all parties involved. For instance, in lease agreements, a landlord may retain absolute discretion to consent to a tenant’s request for modifications to the property. Such provisions are often designed to streamline decision-making processes and allow flexibility.
  • Trust Law Within trust law, trustees are often granted absolute discretion in the administration and distribution of trust assets. This enables trustees to act in the best interests of the beneficiaries, adapting to changing circumstances and individual needs. The courts generally uphold trustees’ decisions made under absolute discretion unless there is evidence of bad faith or gross mismanagement.
  • Administrative Law Absolute discretion is also significant in administrative law, where statutory bodies or officials are endowed with the power to make decisions without being subject to external checks. For example, immigration officers may have absolute discretion in certain visa determinations. This latitude is intended to enable swift and flexible decision-making in complex regulatory environments.

Limitations and Judicial Oversight

Despite its broad scope, absolute discretion is not without limitations. Courts maintain the authority to review the exercise of absolute discretion to prevent abuse and ensure fairness.

  • Judicial Review In British law, judicial review serves as a critical mechanism to oversee the exercise of absolute discretion by public bodies. Courts can scrutinize decisions to ensure they are made lawfully, rationally, and without procedural impropriety. For instance, if a decision made under absolute discretion is challenged, the court will assess whether the decision-maker acted within the bounds of their authority, adhered to the principles of natural justice, and provided sufficient reasons for their decision.
  • Reasonableness and Proportionality The principle of reasonableness, articulated in the landmark case of Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corporation (1948), requires that discretionary powers be exercised reasonably. A decision deemed so unreasonable that no reasonable authority could ever have come to it can be overturned. Additionally, the principle of proportionality, increasingly significant under the Human Rights Act 1998, mandates that actions taken must be proportionate to the aim pursued, preventing excessively harsh outcomes.
  • Good Faith and Improper Motive Absolute discretion must be exercised in good faith and for proper purposes. Decisions influenced by malice, fraud, or conflicts of interest are subject to challenge. The courts will not hesitate to intervene if there is evidence that discretion was exercised for ulterior motives or outside the scope of the authority granted.

Key Case Law

  • Roberts v Hopwood (1925) This case exemplifies the judiciary’s role in overseeing the exercise of discretion. The House of Lords held that the Poplar Borough Council had acted unlawfully in granting wage increases to its employees without considering the financial burden on the ratepayers. This decision underscored that public bodies must exercise discretion with regard to relevant considerations and not in an arbitrary manner.
  • R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Pierson (1997) The House of Lords ruled that the Home Secretary could not increase a prisoner’s tariff retrospectively without providing clear reasons. This case highlighted the need for transparency and justification in the exercise of discretionary powers, reinforcing the principle that such powers are not beyond scrutiny.
  • Padfield v Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (1968) The House of Lords held that the Minister’s refusal to refer a complaint to a committee of inquiry was unlawful. The decision established that even where discretion is framed in broad terms, it must be exercised to promote the purpose for which it was granted and not frustrate the statutory scheme.

Comparative Perspectives

Examining absolute discretion within a comparative framework reveals differences in how legal systems balance the grant of discretion with safeguards against its abuse.

  • United States In the United States, the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) provides a framework for judicial review of administrative decisions, requiring that discretion be exercised within the bounds of reasonableness and fairness. The concept of “Chevron deference” allows courts to defer to administrative agencies’ expertise, provided their decisions are not arbitrary or capricious.
  • European Union Within the European Union, the principle of proportionality plays a central role in reviewing discretionary powers. The European Court of Justice (ECJ) ensures that discretionary decisions by EU institutions and member states do not exceed what is necessary to achieve legitimate objectives.

Implications and Challenges

  • Balancing Flexibility and Accountability The primary challenge in conferring absolute discretion lies in balancing the need for flexibility and efficient decision-making with the imperative of accountability. Granting broad discretionary powers can expedite processes and adapt to specific circumstances, but it also risks arbitrary or unjust decisions.
  • Ensuring Fairness Safeguards such as judicial review, transparency requirements, and the duty to act reasonably are crucial in ensuring that absolute discretion is exercised fairly. These mechanisms provide a check on potential abuses of power and uphold the rule of law.
  • Evolving Legal Standards As societal norms and legal standards evolve, so too does the interpretation of absolute discretion. The incorporation of human rights principles, particularly under the Human Rights Act 1998, has introduced stricter scrutiny of discretionary decisions, ensuring they are compatible with fundamental rights and freedoms.


Absolute discretion, while conferring significant authority, is not an unbridled power. Within the British legal framework, it is tempered by principles of reasonableness, proportionality, and good faith, alongside robust judicial oversight. This ensures that while discretion allows for flexibility and tailored decision-making, it does so within a framework that prevents abuse and promotes fairness. The evolving nature of legal standards continues to shape the contours of absolute discretion, balancing the needs of efficient governance with the imperatives of accountability and justice.


This site contains general legal information but does not constitute professional legal advice for your particular situation. Persuing this glossary does not create an attorney-client or legal adviser relationship. If you have specific questions, please consult a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.

This glossary post was last updated: 7th June 2024.

Cite Term

To help you cite our definitions in your bibliography, here is the proper citation layout for the three major formatting styles, with all of the relevant information filled in.

  • Page URL:
  • Modern Language Association (MLA):Absolute Discretion. DLS Solicitors. June 20 2024
  • Chicago Manual of Style (CMS):Absolute Discretion. DLS Solicitors. (accessed: June 20 2024).
  • American Psychological Association (APA):Absolute Discretion. Retrieved June 20 2024, from website:
Avatar of DLS Solicitors
DLS Solicitors : Family Law Solicitors

Our team of professionals are based in Alderley Edge, Cheshire. We offer clear, specialist legal advice in all matters relating to Family Law, Wills, Trusts, Probate, Lasting Power of Attorney and Court of Protection.

All author posts