Define: Actionable Fraud

Actionable Fraud
Actionable Fraud
Quick Summary of Actionable Fraud

Actionable fraud refers to a type of fraud that can be pursued through legal action. It involves intentional misrepresentation or deceit by one party to another, resulting in harm or loss to the victim. In order for fraud to be actionable, certain elements must be present, including a false representation of a material fact, knowledge of its falsity by the perpetrator, intent to deceive, justifiable reliance by the victim, and resulting damages. Actionable fraud can occur in various contexts, such as business transactions, contracts, investments, or insurance claims. When fraud is proven, the victim may seek remedies such as monetary compensation, rescission of a contract, or punitive damages. Legal action against actionable fraud typically involves filing a lawsuit and presenting evidence to support the claim.

What is the dictionary definition of Actionable Fraud?
Dictionary Definition of Actionable Fraud

Actionable Fraud:

Actionable fraud refers to a type of fraudulent activity that is legally actionable, meaning it can be pursued in a court of law. It involves intentional deception or misrepresentation by an individual or entity with the intent to deceive another party for personal gain or to cause harm. This fraudulent behaviour typically involves false statements, concealment of material facts, or manipulation of information to induce the victim into taking actions that result in financial loss or damage. Actionable fraud can encompass various forms, such as securities fraud, insurance fraud, consumer fraud, or corporate fraud. To be considered actionable, the fraud must meet specific legal criteria, including the presence of fraudulent intent, materiality of the misrepresentation, and causation of harm or damages to the victim. Legal remedies for actionable fraud may include civil lawsuits seeking compensation, criminal charges, or regulatory enforcement actions.

Full Definition Of Actionable Fraud

Fraud is a pervasive and complex issue within the legal framework of the United Kingdom, involving deceit with the intent to secure unfair or unlawful gain. Actionable fraud, in particular, refers to fraudulent acts that provide the victim with grounds to take legal action against the perpetrator. This overview delves into the essential elements, legal principles, statutory provisions, and case law governing actionable fraud in the UK, highlighting its significance, implications, and the judicial mechanisms available for redress.

Definition and Essential Elements of Fraud

In the context of English law, fraud is defined as a false representation made knowingly, without belief in its truth, or recklessly, without caring whether it is true or false, intending to induce another party to act or refrain from acting, thereby causing them detriment. Actionable fraud, therefore, involves several critical elements:

  • False Representation: A false statement, misrepresentation, or concealment of material facts.
  • Knowledge or Belief: The defendant must have known the statement was false, or made it recklessly.
  • Intent to Deceive: The misrepresentation must be made with the intent to deceive the victim.
  • Reliance: The victim must have relied on the false representation.
  • Detriment: The reliance on the false representation must result in a tangible detriment or loss to the victim.

Types of Fraud

Actionable fraud can manifest in various forms, each with specific characteristics and legal implications. Key types include:

  • Fraudulent Misrepresentation: This occurs when a false statement is made with the intent to deceive and induce another party into a contract. Under the Misrepresentation Act 1967, victims can seek rescission of the contract and damages.
  • Deceit: A broader category encompassing any act of intentional deceit causing harm. The tort of deceit provides the basis for civil claims where the plaintiff can prove the defendant knowingly made a false representation.
  • Breach of Fiduciary Duty: Fraud involving a breach of trust by a person in a fiduciary position, such as a trustee, agent, or director, who acts against the interests of the principal for personal gain.
  • Fraudulent Concealment: Deliberate hiding or non-disclosure of material facts, especially where there is a duty to disclose, leading to the victim making a decision based on incomplete or misleading information.
  • Passing Off: A form of commercial fraud where one party misrepresents their goods or services as those of another, causing confusion and potential harm to the victim’s business reputation and goodwill.

Statutory Framework

Several statutes govern actionable fraud in the UK, providing a legal basis for both criminal prosecution and civil claims:

  • Fraud Act 2006: The primary legislation addressing fraud, which categorises offences into three main types:
    • Fraud by False Representation: Making a false representation dishonestly, intending to make a gain or cause loss.
    • Fraud by Failing to Disclose Information: Failing to disclose information when there is a legal duty to do so, intending to make a gain or cause loss.
    • Fraud by Abuse of Position: Abusing a position of trust to make a gain or cause loss.
  • Theft Act 1968: While primarily addressing theft, it includes provisions related to fraud, such as obtaining property by deception and obtaining pecuniary advantage by deception.
  • Misrepresentation Act 1967: Provides remedies for victims of misrepresentation, allowing them to rescind contracts and claim damages.
  • Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008: Protects consumers from misleading and aggressive commercial practices, including fraudulent misrepresentation.

Civil Remedies and Criminal Sanctions

Civil Remedies

Victims of actionable fraud can pursue several civil remedies, aiming to compensate for the loss or damage suffered:

  • Damages: Compensatory damages are awarded to cover actual losses resulting from the fraud. In some cases, exemplary damages may be awarded to punish particularly egregious conduct.
  • Rescission: The victim can seek to rescind (cancel) the contract induced by fraud, restoring the parties to their pre-contractual positions.
  • Restitution: The court may order the defendant to return any gains obtained through fraudulent conduct to the victim.
  • Injunctions: Injunctive relief may be granted to prevent ongoing or imminent fraudulent activity.

Criminal Sanctions

Perpetrators of fraud face criminal prosecution under the Fraud Act 2006 and other relevant statutes. Convictions can result in severe penalties, including:

  • Imprisonment: Depending on the severity of the offence, imprisonment terms can vary. For example, fraud by false representation can attract a maximum sentence of up to 10 years’ imprisonment.
  • Fines: Financial penalties can be imposed, often proportionate to the gain obtained or loss caused by the fraudulent activity.
  • Confiscation Orders: Under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002, courts can issue confiscation orders to recover the proceeds of fraud from the convicted individual.
  • Disqualification Orders: Individuals convicted of certain fraud offences, especially those involving company management, may be disqualified from acting as company directors.

Case Law

Case law plays a pivotal role in shaping the legal landscape of actionable fraud, providing judicial interpretations and precedents. Notable cases include:

  • Derry v Peek (1889): A landmark case that established the principle that for deceit, the defendant must have known the statement was false or made it recklessly. This case defined the boundaries of fraudulent misrepresentation and set the standard for proving intent.
  • Hedley Byrne & Co Ltd v Heller & Partners Ltd (1964): This case expanded the scope of liability for negligent misstatements causing economic loss, bridging the gap between fraud and negligence, and establishing the duty of care in providing accurate information.
  • Smith New Court Securities Ltd v Scrimgeour Vickers (Asset Management) Ltd (1997): The House of Lords ruled on the measure of damages in cases of fraudulent misrepresentation, affirming that the victim is entitled to all consequential losses flowing from the fraud, not limited to the immediate transaction.
  • Royal Bank of Scotland plc v Etridge (No 2) (2001): This case dealt with the issue of undue influence and fraudulent misrepresentation in the context of secured loans, emphasizing the need for independent legal advice to ensure the consent of the parties involved.

Procedural Aspects

Civil Proceedings

Initiating a civil claim for fraud involves several procedural steps:

  • Pre-Action Protocol: Parties are encouraged to follow the pre-action protocol, which includes exchanging information and attempting to settle disputes before resorting to litigation.
  • Filing a Claim: The claimant files a claim form and particulars of the claim with the court, outlining the basis of the fraud and the relief sought.
  • Defence and Reply: The defendant responds with a defence, and the claimant may file a reply if necessary.
  • Disclosure: Both parties are required to disclose relevant documents, ensuring transparency and fairness in the proceedings.
  • Trial: If the case proceeds to trial, both parties present evidence and arguments before a judge, who determines the outcome based on the balance of probabilities.
  • Judgment and Enforcement: If the claimant succeeds, the court issues a judgment, and the claimant can take steps to enforce it, such as seizing assets or garnishing wages.

Criminal Proceedings

Criminal prosecution for fraud follows a different procedural pathway:

  1. Investigation: Fraud offences are investigated by law enforcement agencies, such as the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) or local police.
  2. Charge: If sufficient evidence is found, the suspect is formally charged with the offence.
  3. Pre-Trial Hearings: These include bail hearings, plea and case management hearings, and other procedural matters.
  4. Trial: The trial may be conducted in a Magistrates’ Court for less severe offences or a Crown Court for more serious offences. The prosecution must prove the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
  5. Sentencing: If convicted, the court imposes a sentence based on the severity of the offence, the defendant’s criminal history, and other relevant factors.

Defences of Fraud

Defendants in fraud cases can raise several defences, including:

  • Lack of Intent: Arguing that there was no intent to deceive or defraud the victim.
  • Mistake: Claiming that any false representation was made mistakenly and without fraudulent intent.
  • Reliance: Contesting that the victim did not rely on the alleged misrepresentation.
  • Contributory Negligence: In some civil cases, the defendant may argue that the victim’s negligence contributed to the loss.
  • Statute of Limitations: Asserting that the claim is time-barred under the Limitation Act 1980, which typically allows six years for most fraud claims.


Actionable fraud remains a critical area of legal concern, encompassing a wide range of deceptive practices that can cause significant harm to individuals, businesses, and society at large. The legal framework in the UK provides robust mechanisms for addressing fraud, offering both civil remedies and criminal sanctions to deter fraudulent conduct and compensate victims. Understanding the essential elements, types of fraud, statutory provisions, case law, procedural aspects, and possible defences is crucial for legal practitioners, businesses, and individuals navigating the complexities of actionable fraud.

As fraud evolves with technological advancements and increasing sophistication, ongoing legal developments and judicial interpretations will continue to shape the landscape, ensuring that the law remains responsive and effective in combating fraud and protecting the rights and interests of victims.

Related Phrases
No related content found.

This site contains general legal information but does not constitute professional legal advice for your particular situation. Persuing this glossary does not create an attorney-client or legal adviser relationship. If you have specific questions, please consult a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.

This glossary post was last updated: 8th June 2024.

Cite Term

To help you cite our definitions in your bibliography, here is the proper citation layout for the three major formatting styles, with all of the relevant information filled in.

  • Page URL:
  • Modern Language Association (MLA):Actionable Fraud. DLS Solicitors. June 12 2024
  • Chicago Manual of Style (CMS):Actionable Fraud. DLS Solicitors. (accessed: June 12 2024).
  • American Psychological Association (APA):Actionable Fraud. Retrieved June 12 2024, from website:
Avatar of DLS Solicitors
DLS Solicitors : Family Law Solicitors

Our team of professionals are based in Alderley Edge, Cheshire. We offer clear, specialist legal advice in all matters relating to Family Law, Wills, Trusts, Probate, Lasting Power of Attorney and Court of Protection.

All author posts