Define: Chaste Character

Chaste Character
Chaste Character
What is the dictionary definition of Chaste Character?
Dictionary Definition of Chaste Character

“Chaste character” refers to the quality of being morally pure, modest, and abstaining from any form of sexual misconduct or impurity. It implies a person’s commitment to maintaining virtue and purity in thoughts, actions, and relationships, particularly in the context of sexual behaviour.

Some key points about chaste characters are:

  • Reflects a person’s adherence to moral standards regarding sexual behaviour and conduct.
  • It involves abstaining from sexual activity outside of marriage, fidelity within marriage, and respect for oneself and others.
  • Often associated with virtues such as integrity, self-discipline, and respect for traditional values.
  • Can extend beyond sexual behaviour to encompass modesty in dress, speech, and overall demeanour.

A chaste character signifies a commitment to moral purity and virtuous conduct, especially in matters related to sexual behaviour and relationships.

Full Definition Of Chaste Character

The concept of a “chaste character” is deeply rooted in various aspects of law, particularly in areas concerning morality, sexual conduct, and personal reputation. This term often emerges in legal discussions about defamation, sexual offences, and character evidence. The legal landscape surrounding chaste character involves understanding its historical context, its relevance in contemporary law, and the implications it has on legal proceedings and outcomes. This overview aims to elucidate the legal intricacies of chaste character within British law, highlighting key statutes, case law, and legal principles.

Historical Context

Historically, the notion of chaste character has been linked to societal norms and moral expectations, particularly concerning women. In the 19th and early 20th centuries, a woman’s chastity was often seen as a reflection of her honour and virtue, impacting her social standing and legal rights. Legal systems incorporated these moral standards, which influenced the treatment of women in cases of sexual assault, divorce, and defamation.

Chaste Character in Defamation Law

Defamation law in the UK has evolved to protect individuals from false statements that could harm their reputation. Historically, allegations impugning a woman’s chastity were considered particularly defamatory. The Defamation Act 2013 has modernised the approach, but the protection of personal reputation remains a core principle.

Key Elements

  1. Statement and Its Publication: For a statement to be defamatory, it must be communicated to someone other than the person defamed. Accusations of unchastity historically carried significant defamatory weight.
  2. Harm to Reputation: The plaintiff must show that the statement has caused, or is likely to cause, serious harm to their reputation. In the past, claims questioning a woman’s chastity were often presumed to cause such harm.

Case Law

In historical cases, courts often presumed harm from allegations of unchaste behaviour. For example, in Simmons v. Mitchell (1880), the court recognised that imputations of unchastity could be inherently defamatory. While societal attitudes have evolved, such accusations can still significantly impact reputation and social standing.

Chaste Character in Sexual Offences

The legal treatment of chaste characters in sexual offences has shifted significantly, especially with advancements in gender equality and victim protection.

Historical Perspective

Traditionally, the chastity of a complainant in sexual offence cases could be scrutinised, often to discredit their testimony. This approach has been criticised for perpetuating victim-blaming and deterring reporting of sexual offences.

Modern Reforms

Legislative reforms have aimed to protect victims from invasive scrutiny of their sexual history. The Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999 (YJCEA) introduced significant changes to how evidence of a complainant’s sexual behaviour can be used.

Key Provisions

  • Section 41: Restricts the use of evidence or questions about the complainant’s sexual history, unless deemed necessary to ensure a fair trial. This provision aims to prevent undue prejudice against the complainant and shift focus to the accused’s conduct.

Case Law

The case of R v. A (No. 2) [2001] illustrates the balance courts must strike between protecting complainants and ensuring fair trials. The House of Lords held that while protecting the complainant’s privacy and dignity is crucial, it should not compromise the accused’s right to a fair trial.

Chaste Character in Character Evidence

Character evidence pertains to any testimony or documentation that reflects on an individual’s personality and behaviour, including their chastity.

Relevance in Legal Proceedings

Character evidence can be pertinent in various legal contexts, including:

  • Criminal Trials: To establish or undermine credibility.
  • Civil Cases: Particularly in defamation or family law matters.

Restrictions and Protections

The admissibility of character evidence is often tightly regulated to avoid unfair prejudice. The Criminal Justice Act 2003 outlines conditions under which bad character evidence may be introduced.

Key Provisions

  • Section 98: Defines bad character as evidence of misconduct other than that related to the offence charged.
  • Section 100: Governs the admissibility of non-defendant bad character evidence, requiring it to be of substantial probative value.

Case Law

In R v. Vye [1993], the Court of Appeal considered the use of character evidence to bolster a defendant’s credibility. The decision highlighted the careful balancing required to ensure that character evidence contributes meaningfully to the case without unduly prejudicing the jury.

Impact on Family Law

In family law, the concept of chaste character has implications for divorce, child custody, and other personal matters. Historical norms placed significant emphasis on a spouse’s chastity, especially in divorce proceedings.

Historical Perspective

Adultery and unchastity were traditionally grounds for divorce, heavily influencing the legal outcomes for the involved parties.

Modern Reforms

Contemporary family law has shifted towards a more equitable approach, focusing on the best interests of the child and fairness between parties rather than moral judgments on chastity.

Key Legislation

  • Matrimonial Causes Act 1973: Modernised grounds for divorce, placing less emphasis on chastity and more on irretrievable breakdown of the marriage.
  • Children Act 1989: Centres child custody decisions on the child’s welfare, without moral judgments on parental chastity.

Case Law

In Owens v. Owens [2018], the Supreme Court highlighted the evolution in divorce law, recognising that while moral fault (like adultery) remains a ground for divorce, the focus has shifted towards ensuring fair and just outcomes based on the practical realities of the relationship breakdown.

Social and Ethical Considerations

The treatment of chaste character in law reflects broader societal values and ethical considerations. The shift from a morality-based approach to one focused on fairness, dignity, and equality illustrates the legal system’s responsiveness to changing social norms.

Gender Equality

The historical focus on women’s chastity has evolved, with modern law increasingly recognising the importance of gender equality. Legal reforms have sought to eliminate gender biases, ensuring that both men and women are treated equitably in matters involving character and reputation.

Victim Protection

Protecting victims of sexual offences from invasive scrutiny of their sexual history is a critical ethical consideration. Legal reforms like those in the YJCEA 1999 reflect a commitment to victim dignity and reducing secondary victimisation.

Fair Trial Rights

Balancing the protection of individual dignity with the right to a fair trial remains a complex ethical challenge. Ensuring that evidence rules and trial procedures do not unfairly prejudice either party is essential for maintaining justice.


The concept of chaste character has evolved significantly within British law, reflecting changes in societal norms and ethical standards. From its historical roots as a moral yardstick, the chaste character has transitioned into a nuanced legal concept, balancing the protection of personal dignity with the demands of justice.

Legislation such as the Defamation Act 2013, the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999, and the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 illustrates the legal system’s adaptation to contemporary values. Case law continues to shape and refine the application of these principles, ensuring that the treatment of chaste characters aligns with modern standards of fairness and equality.

In sum, while the notion of chaste character may have its origins in historical and moral contexts, its contemporary legal relevance is grounded in principles of fairness, dignity, and justice. The legal framework surrounding chaste character underscores the importance of protecting individual reputations, ensuring fair treatment in legal proceedings, and upholding ethical standards in the pursuit of justice.

Chaste Character FAQ'S

Having a chaste character refers to maintaining purity and abstaining from any form of sexual misconduct or immoral behaviour.

No, having a chaste character is not a legal requirement. It is a personal choice and a moral or religious value that individuals may choose to uphold.

Employers cannot discriminate against individuals based on their chaste character, as it falls under protected characteristics such as religion or moral beliefs. Discrimination based on chaste character may be considered a violation of anti-discrimination laws.

No, individuals cannot be legally punished for not having a chaste character. Personal choices regarding morality or sexual behaviour are generally protected under privacy rights and freedom of expression.

In most cases, a person’s chaste character is not directly relevant to child custody or visitation rights. Courts typically focus on the best interests of the child, considering factors such as parental fitness, stability, and the ability to provide a safe environment.

In general, employers cannot terminate an employee solely based on their chaste character. However, if an employee’s behaviour or actions related to their sexual conduct or morality significantly impact their job performance or create a hostile work environment, termination may be possible.

Denying housing based solely on a person’s chaste character may be considered discrimination. Landlords and housing providers are generally prohibited from discriminating against individuals based on protected characteristics, including moral or religious beliefs.

Medical professionals are generally required to provide treatment to individuals regardless of their character. Denying medical treatment based on personal moral or religious beliefs may be considered a violation of medical ethics and could potentially lead to legal consequences.

If someone falsely accuses another person of lacking chaste character, it may be considered defamation. Defamation involves making false statements that harm a person’s reputation. The accused individual may have grounds to pursue a defamation lawsuit if they can prove that the false accusation caused them harm.

Related Phrases
No related content found.

This site contains general legal information but does not constitute professional legal advice for your particular situation. Persuing this glossary does not create an attorney-client or legal adviser relationship. If you have specific questions, please consult a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.

This glossary post was last updated: 10th June 2024.

Cite Term

To help you cite our definitions in your bibliography, here is the proper citation layout for the three major formatting styles, with all of the relevant information filled in.

  • Page URL:
  • Modern Language Association (MLA):Chaste Character. DLS Solicitors. June 20 2024
  • Chicago Manual of Style (CMS):Chaste Character. DLS Solicitors. (accessed: June 20 2024).
  • American Psychological Association (APA):Chaste Character. Retrieved June 20 2024, from website:
Avatar of DLS Solicitors
DLS Solicitors : Family Law Solicitors

Our team of professionals are based in Alderley Edge, Cheshire. We offer clear, specialist legal advice in all matters relating to Family Law, Wills, Trusts, Probate, Lasting Power of Attorney and Court of Protection.

All author posts