Define: Literal Infringement

Literal Infringement
Literal Infringement
Quick Summary of Literal Infringement

Literal infringement occurs when someone replicates or utilises something that belongs to another person without their consent in a manner that is identical to what the owner has the right to. This can occur with patents, copyrights, and trademarks. It’s akin to taking someone’s toy without permission and using it in the same manner as they do. This behaviour is not acceptable and can result in consequences.

Full Definition Of Literal Infringement

Literal infringement refers to a form of infringement where every element and limitation of a patent claim is found exactly in the accused product or process. This means that the accused product or process is an exact match to what is described in the patent claim. For instance, if a patent claim describes a widget with a specific shape, size, and material, and someone creates a widget that perfectly matches that description, they are engaging in literal infringement. It is important to distinguish literal infringement from nonliteral infringement, which happens when an accused product or process does not precisely match the language of the patent claim but is still similar enough to be considered an infringement under the doctrine of equivalents. It should be noted that literal infringement is just one type of infringement, and there are other forms of infringement that can occur in intellectual property law, such as trademark infringement and copyright infringement.

Literal Infringement FAQ'S

Literal infringement refers to the unauthorized use or reproduction of someone else’s copyrighted work in its exact form, without any alterations or modifications.

To determine if your work has been subject to literal infringement, you need to compare the alleged infringing work with your original work. If the alleged infringing work is identical or substantially similar to your work, it may be considered literal infringement.

The consequences of literal infringement can include legal action, such as a lawsuit filed by the copyright owner seeking damages and an injunction to stop the infringing activity. Additionally, the infringer may be required to pay monetary damages and legal fees.

Giving credit to the original creator does not automatically grant you the right to use their work without permission. You still need to obtain proper authorization, such as a license or permission, to use someone else’s copyrighted work.

Fair use is a legal doctrine that allows limited use of copyrighted material without permission from the copyright owner. However, it is a complex and fact-specific analysis, and not all uses will qualify as fair use. Whether fair use applies in a specific case depends on several factors, including the purpose and character of the use, the nature of the copyrighted work, the amount and substantiality of the portion used, and the effect on the market for the original work.

Literal infringement can occur even if the use was unintentional. Copyright law does not require intent for infringement to occur. If your use of someone else’s work meets the criteria for literal infringement, you may still be held liable, regardless of your intentions.

Using a small portion of someone else’s work without permission may still constitute literal infringement. The amount and substantiality of the portion used is one of the factors considered in determining whether infringement has occurred. Even using a small portion of a work can be infringing if it is a significant or essential part of the original work.

The commercial nature of the infringing use is one factor considered in determining damages in a copyright infringement lawsuit. However, even if you are not making money from your use of someone else’s work, you can still be sued for literal infringement and may be held liable for damages.

Using someone else’s work for educational purposes may be considered fair use in certain circumstances. However, it is important to evaluate each specific use case based on the fair use factors mentioned earlier. Simply using a work for educational purposes does not automatically exempt you from copyright infringement.

Modifying someone else’s work slightly may not necessarily protect you from literal infringement. If the modified work still bears substantial similarity to the original work, it may still be considered infringing. The degree of modification and the overall similarity between the two works will be evaluated to determine if infringement has occurred.

Related Phrases
No related content found.
Disclaimer

This site contains general legal information but does not constitute professional legal advice for your particular situation. Persuing this glossary does not create an attorney-client or legal adviser relationship. If you have specific questions, please consult a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.

This glossary post was last updated: 17th April 2024.

Cite Term

To help you cite our definitions in your bibliography, here is the proper citation layout for the three major formatting styles, with all of the relevant information filled in.

  • Page URL:https://dlssolicitors.com/define/literal-infringement/
  • Modern Language Association (MLA):Literal Infringement. dlssolicitors.com. DLS Solicitors. May 09 2024 https://dlssolicitors.com/define/literal-infringement/.
  • Chicago Manual of Style (CMS):Literal Infringement. dlssolicitors.com. DLS Solicitors. https://dlssolicitors.com/define/literal-infringement/ (accessed: May 09 2024).
  • American Psychological Association (APA):Literal Infringement. dlssolicitors.com. Retrieved May 09 2024, from dlssolicitors.com website: https://dlssolicitors.com/define/literal-infringement/
Avatar of DLS Solicitors
DLS Solicitors : Divorce Solicitors

Our team of professionals are based in Alderley Edge, Cheshire. We offer clear, specialist legal advice in all matters relating to Family Law, Wills, Trusts, Probate, Lasting Power of Attorney and Court of Protection.

All author posts