Define: Malversation

Quick Summary of Malversation

Malversation refers to the act of official corruption or misconduct carried out by individuals in positions of power or authority. Instances of malversation include embezzlement of public funds by government officials for personal gain, acceptance of bribes by police officers to ignore criminal activities, and judges receiving gifts or favours in exchange for favourable rulings. These examples demonstrate that malversation involves a betrayal of trust and a disregard for the ethical and legal obligations that accompany holding a position of authority. It undermines the integrity of public institutions and diminishes public confidence in government officials.

What is the dictionary definition of Malversation?
Dictionary Definition of Malversation

Malversation refers to the act of an individual in a position of authority or employment engaging in wrongful or corrupt behaviour, akin to cheating or violating regulations while performing their duties.

Full Definition Of Malversation

Malversation, often referred to as embezzlement or corruption, is a significant offence within the sphere of public service and governance. The term broadly encompasses various forms of dishonest or fraudulent conduct by a public official entrusted with public resources. This legal overview will delve into the definition, historical context, legal frameworks, elements, and consequences of malversation, as well as notable case studies and preventive measures.

Definition and Scope

Malversation is the fraudulent appropriation of funds or property entrusted to one’s care, especially in a public office. In British legal terminology, it is synonymous with corruption, embezzlement, and misconduct in public office. The key aspect of malversation is the breach of trust by public officials, who divert resources for personal gain or other improper purposes.

Historical Context

The concept of malversation dates back to ancient times, when misuse of public funds was heavily penalised. Throughout history, societies have evolved mechanisms to curb such activities. In medieval England, for instance, the Domesday Book served as a record to track the assets and obligations of the realm, helping to prevent misappropriation. Over time, the legal frameworks have become more sophisticated, incorporating various laws and regulations to combat malversation.

Legal Frameworks

UK Legislation

In the United Kingdom, malversation is addressed under various statutes and common law principles. Key legislative frameworks include:

  • The Theft Act 1968: This Act consolidates offences related to theft and similar or associated offences. Embezzlement, although not explicitly mentioned, is covered under the sections dealing with theft and fraud.
  • The Fraud Act 2006: This Act specifically addresses fraudulent activities, including false representation, failing to disclose information and abuse of position. Section 4 of the Act covers the abuse of position, which is directly relevant to malversation.
  • The Bribery Act 2010: This Act modernised and consolidated the law on bribery, including offences related to public officials. It criminalises both the giving and receiving of bribes and applies to actions within and outside the UK.
  • Common Law: Misconduct in public office remains a common law offence, which can be applied broadly to cases of malversation. This offence requires proof that a public officer wilfully neglected to perform their duty or wilfully misconducted themselves to such a degree as to amount to an abuse of the public’s trust.

International Conventions

The UK is also a signatory to various international conventions aimed at curbing corruption and malversation, including:

  • The United Nations Convention against Corruption (UNCAC): This global treaty requires member states to implement measures to prevent corruption, criminalise certain behaviours, and promote international cooperation.
  • The Council of Europe’s Criminal Law Convention on Corruption: This convention mandates member states to criminalise corrupt practices and enhance cooperation among nations.

Elements of Malversation

To establish a case of malversation, certain elements must be proven:

  • Existence of a Fiduciary Duty: The accused must hold a position of trust, typically as a public official or someone entrusted with public funds or property.
  • Misappropriation or Diversion: There must be evidence that the public official misappropriated or diverted the funds or property for personal gain or other improper purposes.
  • Intent: The act must be intentional. Negligence or accidental mismanagement does not typically constitute malversation.
  • Breach of Duty: The official’s actions must represent a breach of their duty to act in the public’s best interest.

Consequences of Malversation

The consequences of malversation are multifaceted, impacting both the individual perpetrator and broader society. They include:

Legal Consequences

  • Criminal Penalties: Convicted individuals can face significant penalties, including imprisonment, fines, and forfeiture of assets. The severity of the punishment typically depends on the magnitude of the offence.
  • Disqualification from Office: Public officials found guilty of malversation are usually disqualified from holding any public office in the future.
  • Civil Liabilities: Victims of malversation, such as government entities, may pursue civil actions to recover misappropriated funds or seek damages.

Societal Consequences

  • Erosion of Public Trust: Malversation undermines trust in public institutions and officials, leading to cynicism and apathy among the populace.
  • Economic Impact: The diversion of public funds for personal use can lead to underfunding of essential services and infrastructure, negatively affecting economic growth and development.
  • Moral and Ethical Decline: The prevalence of malversation can lead to a broader culture of corruption, where unethical behaviour becomes normalised.

Notable Case Studies

The Westminster Expenses Scandal (2009)

One of the most significant malversation cases in recent British history is the Westminster expenses scandal. In 2009, it was revealed that numerous Members of Parliament (MPs) had been claiming fraudulent expenses, leading to widespread public outrage. The scandal resulted in several MPs being prosecuted and imprisoned, as well as substantial reforms in the parliamentary expenses system.

Operation Elveden

Operation Elveden was a British police investigation into corrupt payments made by journalists to public officials. It was part of a wider investigation into phone hacking and corruption within the media. Several public officials and journalists were prosecuted, highlighting the intricate links between media corruption and public malversation.

The Case of John Poulson

In the 1970s, architect John Poulson was at the centre of a major corruption scandal involving the bribery of public officials to secure lucrative contracts. The scandal exposed widespread corruption in local government and led to several high-profile convictions, including that of Poulson himself and numerous public officials.

Preventive Measures

Preventing malversation requires a multi-faceted approach, combining legal, administrative, and societal measures.

Legal and Administrative Measures

  • Robust Legal Frameworks: Ensuring comprehensive and up-to-date laws that address all forms of malversation.
  • Transparency and Accountability: Implementing transparent processes and systems for managing public funds, along with mechanisms for regular audits and checks.
  • Whistleblower Protections: Encouraging reporting of malversation through robust whistleblower protection laws that shield informants from retaliation.
  • Training and Ethics Programmes: Educating public officials on ethical standards and the legal implications of malversation.

Societal Measures

  • Public Awareness Campaigns: Raising awareness about the consequences of malversation and promoting a culture of integrity and accountability.
  • Civil Society Involvement: Encouraging the participation of civil society organisations in monitoring and reporting malversation.
  • Media Role: Promoting investigative journalism and protecting media freedom to uncover and report malversation cases.


Malversation remains a critical issue within public administration, posing significant challenges to governance and public trust. Through comprehensive legal frameworks, proactive administrative measures, and robust societal involvement, it is possible to mitigate the incidence of malversation. Continued vigilance and a commitment to ethical governance are essential to maintaining the integrity of public institutions and ensuring the responsible management of public resources.

The evolving nature of malversation necessitates ongoing adaptation and strengthening of laws and preventive strategies. By understanding the historical context, legal underpinnings, and practical measures to combat malversation, societies can better safeguard against this pervasive issue, fostering an environment of trust, transparency, and accountability.

Malversation FAQ'S

Malversation refers to the act of a public official misappropriating public funds or property entrusted to them for personal gain.

The penalties for malversation vary depending on the amount misappropriated. It can range from imprisonment and fines to permanent disqualification from holding public office.

Malversation can be proven through a thorough investigation, gathering evidence such as financial records, witness testimonies, and other relevant documents that establish the misappropriation of funds or property.

No, malversation specifically refers to the act committed by public officials who have been entrusted with public funds or property.

While both involve the misappropriation of funds or property, malversation specifically applies to public officials, whereas embezzlement can be committed by anyone entrusted with another person’s funds or property.

Returning the misappropriated funds may be considered as a mitigating factor during sentencing, but it does not automatically result in the charges being dropped.

Yes, malversation can also involve the misappropriation of public property or assets, not just funds.

Yes, if multiple individuals are involved in the misappropriation of public funds or property, they can all be charged with malversation.

While direct evidence is preferred, circumstantial evidence can also be used to establish malversation. It is important to present a strong case with sufficient evidence to prove the misappropriation.

Yes, there is usually a statute of limitations for filing malversation charges, but it varies depending on the jurisdiction. It is best to consult with a legal professional to determine if the charges can still be filed.

Related Phrases
No related content found.

This site contains general legal information but does not constitute professional legal advice for your particular situation. Persuing this glossary does not create an attorney-client or legal adviser relationship. If you have specific questions, please consult a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.

This glossary post was last updated: 8th June 2024.

Cite Term

To help you cite our definitions in your bibliography, here is the proper citation layout for the three major formatting styles, with all of the relevant information filled in.

  • Page URL:
  • Modern Language Association (MLA):Malversation. DLS Solicitors. June 12 2024
  • Chicago Manual of Style (CMS):Malversation. DLS Solicitors. (accessed: June 12 2024).
  • American Psychological Association (APA):Malversation. Retrieved June 12 2024, from website:
Avatar of DLS Solicitors
DLS Solicitors : Family Law Solicitors

Our team of professionals are based in Alderley Edge, Cheshire. We offer clear, specialist legal advice in all matters relating to Family Law, Wills, Trusts, Probate, Lasting Power of Attorney and Court of Protection.

All author posts