Mid-level scrutiny, also known as intermediate scrutiny, is a legal term used to describe a level of examination that falls between strict scrutiny and rational basis scrutiny. It is applied when evaluating laws that may have differential impacts on specific groups, such as those based on gender or sexual orientation. In this level of scrutiny, the court assesses whether the law is substantially related to an important government interest.
Mid-level scrutiny, also known as intermediate scrutiny, is a legal standard utilised by courts to assess laws that potentially discriminate against specific groups. Under this standard, the government must demonstrate that the law serves a significant government interest and is closely connected to achieving that interest. For instance, a state law mandating firefighters to be at least 6 feet tall would be subject to mid-level scrutiny as it may discriminate against women and certain ethnicities who tend to be shorter. To meet this standard, the government would need to prove that the height requirement is necessary for the job and that there are no alternative methods to ensure public safety. Similarly, a state law prohibiting same-sex couples from adopting children would also be subject to mid-level scrutiny as it may discriminate against LGBTQ+ individuals. To pass this scrutiny, the government would have to show that the law serves an important government interest, such as safeguarding the best interests of children, and that the ban on same-sex adoption is substantially related to achieving that interest. These examples highlight how mid-level scrutiny necessitates the government to justify laws that potentially discriminate against specific groups. The government must establish that the law serves a significant government interest and that there are no less discriminatory alternatives to achieve that interest.
Mid-level scrutiny is a legal standard used by courts to evaluate the constitutionality of laws that affect certain fundamental rights, such as the right to free speech or the right to equal protection under the law.
Mid-level scrutiny is typically applied when a law or government action affects a fundamental right that is not considered to be a “strict scrutiny” issue, but is still important enough to warrant more than a “rational basis” review.
Laws that restrict commercial speech, laws that regulate the use of public spaces for protests or demonstrations, and laws that discriminate on the basis of gender or sexual orientation are all examples of laws that might be subject to mid-level scrutiny.
Strict scrutiny is a higher level of scrutiny that is applied when a law or government action affects a fundamental right that is considered to be of the utmost importance, such as the right to vote or the right to marry. Mid-level scrutiny is a lower level of scrutiny that is applied to laws that affect less important fundamental rights.
When applying mid-level scrutiny, courts will consider factors such as the importance of the right at issue, the government’s interest in the law or action, and whether the law or action is narrowly tailored to achieve that interest.
The outcome of a mid-level scrutiny analysis will depend on the specific facts and circumstances of the case. If the court determines that the law or action is constitutional under mid-level scrutiny, it will be upheld. If the court determines that the law or action is unconstitutional, it will be struck down.
No, a law can only be subject to one level of scrutiny at a time. However, different aspects of a law may be subject to different levels of scrutiny depending on the specific rights at issue.
In a mid-level scrutiny analysis, the government has the burden of proving that the law or action is constitutional.
No, mid-level scrutiny is only applied to laws that affect fundamental rights.
Rational basis review is a lower level of scrutiny that is applied to laws that do not affect fundamental rights. Under rational basis review, a law will be upheld as long as it is rationally related to a legitimate government interest. Mid-level scrutiny requires a higher level of justification from the government.
This site contains general legal information but does not constitute professional legal advice for your particular situation. Persuing this glossary does not create an attorney-client or legal adviser relationship. If you have specific questions, please consult a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.
This glossary post was last updated: 16th April 2024.
To help you cite our definitions in your bibliography, here is the proper citation layout for the three major formatting styles, with all of the relevant information filled in.
- Page URL:https://dlssolicitors.com/define/mid-level-scrutiny/
- Modern Language Association (MLA):Mid-Level Scrutiny. dlssolicitors.com. DLS Solicitors. May 09 2024 https://dlssolicitors.com/define/mid-level-scrutiny/.
- Chicago Manual of Style (CMS):Mid-Level Scrutiny. dlssolicitors.com. DLS Solicitors. https://dlssolicitors.com/define/mid-level-scrutiny/ (accessed: May 09 2024).
- American Psychological Association (APA):Mid-Level Scrutiny. dlssolicitors.com. Retrieved May 09 2024, from dlssolicitors.com website: https://dlssolicitors.com/define/mid-level-scrutiny/
Our team of professionals are based in Alderley Edge, Cheshire. We offer clear, specialist legal advice in all matters relating to Family Law, Wills, Trusts, Probate, Lasting Power of Attorney and Court of Protection.
All author posts