Define: Propter Majorem Securitatem

“Propter Majorem Securitatem” is a Latin phrase that translates to “for greater security.” It is often used in legal contexts to justify actions taken in the interest of public safety or national security.

Yes, in certain circumstances, the government may invoke “Propter Majorem Securitatem” to limit or suspend certain individual rights temporarily. However, such actions must be proportionate, necessary, and subject to judicial review.

Actions that can be justified under “Propter Majorem Securitatem” may include surveillance measures, restrictions on freedom of movement, enhanced security screenings, or the imposition of emergency measures during times of crisis or threat to public safety.

Yes, individuals can challenge actions taken under “Propter Majorem Securitatem” if they believe their rights have been unjustifiably infringed upon. They can seek legal remedies through the courts to ensure that any limitations on their rights are lawful and proportionate.

“Propter Majorem Securitatem” is a specific legal principle that emphasizes the importance of public safety and security. It is often invoked in situations where there is an imminent threat or crisis, distinguishing it from other general justifications for limiting rights, such as public interest or national security.

Yes, the government’s use of “Propter Majorem Securitatem” is subject to legal limitations. It must be based on credible evidence of a genuine threat, be proportionate to the threat, and not unduly infringe upon fundamental rights protected by the law.

No, “Propter Majorem Securitatem” cannot be used as a justification for discrimination or profiling based on race, religion, ethnicity, or any other protected characteristic. Any actions taken under this principle must be based on objective criteria and not result in unjustifiable discrimination.

No, “Propter Majorem Securitatem” is not meant to be invoked indefinitely. It is a temporary measure that should be lifted once the threat or crisis has subsided. The government must regularly review and reassess the necessity and proportionality of any actions taken under this principle.

Yes, international human rights standards can limit the government’s use of “Propter Majorem Securitatem.” Governments are bound by international treaties and conventions that protect fundamental rights, and any actions taken under this principle must comply with these obligations.

Individuals can stay informed about the government’s use of “Propter Majorem Securitatem” by following news updates, engaging with civil society organisations, monitoring legal developments, and seeking legal advice if they believe their rights have been affected.