Define: Rule Of The Last Antecedent

The last antecedent rule is a method used by courts to interpret sentences. It states that words or phrases that describe something only apply to the immediate preceding element, unless the context or the entire sentence indicates otherwise. For instance, in the sentence “I gave apples to John, Jane, and the teacher in the park,” the phrase “in the park” only pertains to the teacher and not to John or Jane. This rule aids in enhancing our comprehension of sentence meaning.

The rule of the last antecedent is a principle used by courts to interpret which words or phrases a qualifying phrase modifies. According to this rule, qualifying words or phrases modify the words or phrases immediately preceding them, unless the context or the spirit of the entire writing requires otherwise. For instance, in the phrase “Texas courts, New Mexico courts, and New York courts in the federal system,” the words “in the federal system” may only modify “New York courts” and not “Texas courts” or “New Mexico courts.” This is because “New York courts” is the last antecedent before the qualifying phrase. The rule of the last antecedent is significant as it helps clarify the meaning of a sentence or phrase. By adhering to this rule, we can determine which words or phrases are being modified and avoid confusion or ambiguity. Another example of the rule of the last antecedent is the sentence “I saw a man with a telescope on the hill.” In this case, the phrase “on the hill” modifies “telescope” and not “man” because “telescope” is the last antecedent before the qualifying phrase.

This site contains general legal information but does not constitute professional legal advice for your particular situation. Persuing this glossary does not create an attorney-client or legal adviser relationship. If you have specific questions, please consult a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.

This glossary post was last updated: 16th April 2024.