The individuals responsible for determining the actual events in a trial can either be a collective of ordinary citizens known as a jury or a single individual known as a judge. They attentively consider all the evidence presented and subsequently render a verdict based on their perception of the truth.
The trier of fact, such as a judge or jury, is responsible for determining the facts of a case during a trial. They carefully consider the evidence presented by both sides and make a decision based on the facts. For instance, in a criminal trial, the jury acts as the trier of fact and decides whether the defendant is guilty or not guilty after hearing the evidence from the prosecution and defence. Similarly, in a civil trial, the trier of fact, which can be a judge or jury, listens to the evidence from both parties and determines who is liable for the damages claimed by the plaintiff. These examples highlight the role of the trier of fact in making decisions based on the facts presented during a trial.
A trier of fact is a person or group responsible for determining the facts of a case in a legal proceeding, such as a judge or jury.
The trier of fact is responsible for evaluating the evidence presented in a case and making a decision based on that evidence.
Yes, in some cases a judge may act as the trier of fact, particularly in bench trials where there is no jury.
The trier of fact is responsible for determining the facts of a case, while the trier of law is responsible for interpreting and applying the law to those facts.
The trier of fact makes a decision based on the evidence presented in the case and the instructions given by the judge regarding the applicable law.
In some cases, the decision of the trier of fact can be appealed if there are grounds for challenging the decision based on errors in the legal process.
In cases where the trier of fact is a jury, if they cannot reach a unanimous decision, it may result in a hung jury and a mistrial.
The trier of fact considers the credibility of witnesses, the relevance and reliability of evidence, and the overall weight of the evidence presented.
The trier of fact is generally only allowed to consider evidence that was properly presented in court, although there are some exceptions to this rule.
The standard of proof varies depending on the type of case, but in criminal cases, the standard is usually “beyond a reasonable doubt,” while in civil cases it is typically “preponderance of the evidence.”
This site contains general legal information but does not constitute professional legal advice for your particular situation. Persuing this glossary does not create an attorney-client or legal adviser relationship. If you have specific questions, please consult a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.
This glossary post was last updated: 17th April 2024.
To help you cite our definitions in your bibliography, here is the proper citation layout for the three major formatting styles, with all of the relevant information filled in.
- Page URL:https://dlssolicitors.com/define/trier-of-fact/
- Modern Language Association (MLA):Trier Of Fact. dlssolicitors.com. DLS Solicitors. May 09 2024 https://dlssolicitors.com/define/trier-of-fact/.
- Chicago Manual of Style (CMS):Trier Of Fact. dlssolicitors.com. DLS Solicitors. https://dlssolicitors.com/define/trier-of-fact/ (accessed: May 09 2024).
- American Psychological Association (APA):Trier Of Fact. dlssolicitors.com. Retrieved May 09 2024, from dlssolicitors.com website: https://dlssolicitors.com/define/trier-of-fact/
Our team of professionals are based in Alderley Edge, Cheshire. We offer clear, specialist legal advice in all matters relating to Family Law, Wills, Trusts, Probate, Lasting Power of Attorney and Court of Protection.
All author posts