A Walker Process claim is a legal action initiated by an individual accused of patent infringement. The purpose of this claim is to demonstrate that the patent is invalid due to fraudulent or deceptive practices employed by the patent owner during the application process. The claim is grounded in antitrust law, alleging that the patent owner is attempting to unjustly manipulate a market.
A Walker Process claim is a counterclaim that can be made in an infringement lawsuit, seeking a declaratory judgement that the patent in question is invalid due to fraudulent actions by the patent owner. This claim is based on antitrust law and alleges that the patent owner wrongfully attempted to monopolize a market. For instance, if a company is sued for patent infringement, they may assert a Walker Process claim as a defence, arguing that the patent is invalid because it was obtained through fraudulent means and is being used to unfairly dominate the market. The term “Walker Process” originates from a significant Supreme Court case, Walker Process Equip. , Inc. v. Food Mach. & Chem. , which established the legal foundation for this type of claim.
A Walker Process claim is a legal cause of action that allows a party to sue a patent holder for fraudulently obtaining or enforcing a patent, specifically by knowingly making false representations to the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) during the patent application process.
To establish a Walker Process claim, the plaintiff must prove the following elements: (1) the defendant obtained or enforced a patent through knowing and willful fraud on the USPTO; (2) the defendant intended to deceive the USPTO; (3) the plaintiff suffered antitrust injury as a result of the fraudulent conduct; and (4) the plaintiff’s injury was caused by the defendant’s fraudulent conduct.
The purpose of a Walker Process claim is to provide a remedy for parties who have been harmed by a patent holder’s fraudulent conduct in obtaining or enforcing a patent. It allows the injured party to seek damages and potentially have the patent declared unenforceable.
Yes, a Walker Process claim can be brought against both practicing entities and non-practicing entities. The key factor is whether the patent holder obtained or enforced the patent through fraudulent means, regardless of their business activities.
If successful, a plaintiff in a Walker Process claim may be awarded damages, including actual damages suffered as a result of the fraudulent conduct, treble damages (three times the actual damages), and attorney’s fees.
Yes, a Walker Process claim can be brought alongside other claims, such as antitrust claims or patent invalidity claims. However, it is important to consult with an attorney to determine the best legal strategy based on the specific circumstances of the case.
The statute of limitations for filing a Walker Process claim varies depending on the jurisdiction and the specific facts of the case. It is crucial to consult with an attorney to determine the applicable statute of limitations and ensure timely filing.
No, a Walker Process claim can only be brought against an enforceable patent. Once a patent has expired, it can no longer be enforced, and therefore, a Walker Process claim would not be applicable.
No, a Walker Process claim requires proof of fraudulent conduct in obtaining or enforcing a patent. If the patent holder obtained the patent in good faith, without any intent to deceive the USPTO, a Walker Process claim would not be viable.
Yes, like any other legal claim, a Walker Process claim can be settled out of court through negotiation and agreement between the parties involved. However, the terms of the settlement would depend on the specific circumstances and the willingness of the parties to reach a resolution.
This site contains general legal information but does not constitute professional legal advice for your particular situation. Persuing this glossary does not create an attorney-client or legal adviser relationship. If you have specific questions, please consult a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.
This glossary post was last updated: 17th April 2024.
To help you cite our definitions in your bibliography, here is the proper citation layout for the three major formatting styles, with all of the relevant information filled in.
- Page URL:https://dlssolicitors.com/define/walker-process-claim/
- Modern Language Association (MLA):Walker Process Claim. dlssolicitors.com. DLS Solicitors. May 09 2024 https://dlssolicitors.com/define/walker-process-claim/.
- Chicago Manual of Style (CMS):Walker Process Claim. dlssolicitors.com. DLS Solicitors. https://dlssolicitors.com/define/walker-process-claim/ (accessed: May 09 2024).
- American Psychological Association (APA):Walker Process Claim. dlssolicitors.com. Retrieved May 09 2024, from dlssolicitors.com website: https://dlssolicitors.com/define/walker-process-claim/
Our team of professionals are based in Alderley Edge, Cheshire. We offer clear, specialist legal advice in all matters relating to Family Law, Wills, Trusts, Probate, Lasting Power of Attorney and Court of Protection.
All author posts