Adverse Possession: Acquiring Land for Free

Adverse Possession: Acquiring Land for Free
Adverse Possession: Acquiring Land for Free

Adverse possession is a legal process through which a person who is not the legal owner of a piece of land may become its legal owner by occupying it (possessing it) without the consent of the true owner (adversely) for a required period of time.

This rule may initially seem unusual, and indeed it is, but a common justification for it is that it promotes efficient land use. Claims for adverse possession most often arise in boundary disputes, especially where boundaries are unclear. Interestingly, claims can also arise when a squatter has lived on a residential property, even though it is a criminal offence to trespass on a residential property.

Whether you intend to make an application for adverse possession or wish to prevent or defend such a claim, it is crucial to seek legal advice promptly.

The requirements to make a claim in adverse possession

To successfully establish adverse possession, two elements must be satisfied. First, the claimant must demonstrate continuous factual possession of the land, combined with an intention to possess it. The required minimum period of possession depends on whether the land is registered or unregistered. For registered land, the period is 10 years. For unregistered land, or where the period of possession of registered land ended before October 13, 2003, the period is 12 years.

“Factual possession” and “intention to possess” pertain to the relationship between the squatter and the land. To establish factual possession, a squatter must demonstrate a sufficient degree of physical control over the land, which is specific to the nature and usual use of the land in question. The squatter must prove that they have dealt with the land as though they were the owner and have done so exclusively. The intention to possess element requires the squatter to show that it was their intention to possess the land in their own name and to exclude others throughout the period of possession. The required intent is inferred from the acts of factual possession on which the squatter relies.

If a squatter can demonstrate continuous factual possession with an intention to possess the land for the required time period, they may apply to be registered as the owner of the land. A successful application grants the squatter possessory title over the land they have occupied.

How to prevent an adverse possession claim

The saying “prevention is better than cure” certainly applies to dealing with adverse possession.

Initially, it’s crucial to determine whether you are the rightful proprietor of the land in question. While this is usually clear, in cases where boundaries are uncertain, obtaining HM Land Registry title plans can reveal the general position of boundaries. If clarity is still lacking, reviewing any deeds for the land may offer more detailed boundary information. Assuming you are the landowner, the following strategies can be considered to counter a squatter’s claim to your land:.

As you may recall, factual possession requires exclusive physical control of the land. Therefore, interrupting the squatter’s possession can invalidate their claim. Methods to disrupt the squatter’s possession include physically enclosing or regularly maintaining the land. Removing any barriers erected by the squatter may also suffice, but care must be taken to avoid damaging the barrier in the process. Interestingly, legal precedent suggests that interruptions need only be for a brief period, even as short as one hour.

Additionally, for possession to be adverse, it must occur without the owner’s consent. Granting express or implied permission to the squatter prevents them from claiming adverse possession. It’s advisable to document any permission granted, such as by providing the squatter with a licence to use the land.

Another option is to initiate possession proceedings against the squatter to remove them from your land. However, this approach carries risks, as an evicted squatter who previously held adverse possession for the required period could still make a claim based on their previous possession.

Avatar of DLS Solicitors by DLS Solicitors
29th April 2024
Avatar of DLS Solicitors
DLS Solicitors

Our team of professionals are based in Alderley Edge, Cheshire. We offer clear, specialist legal advice in all matters relating to Family Law, Wills, Trusts, Probate, Lasting Power of Attorney and Court of Protection.

All author posts
Related Posts
  • insolvent estate
    Dealing With An Insolvent Estate

    Gain invaluable insights into handling an insolvent estate with DLS Solicitors. Our concise guide outlines the legal processes and responsibilities involved in navigating this complex situation. Trust our experienced team to provide expert guidance and support.

  • The Impact Of Prenuptial Agreements On Property Division In Divorce
    The Impact Of Prenuptial Agreements On Property Division In Divorce

    When it comes to navigating the intricacies of separation or divorce, one fundamental aspect that stands out prominently is the division of property. The process can be complex and emotionally charged, often necessitating professional legal counsel. This comprehensive guide aims to demystify the concept of property division within the context of the United Kingdom’s (UK)

  • Can I Use A Will Written Abroad?
    Can I Use A Will Written Abroad?

    Welcome to DLS Solicitors’ comprehensive guide on the complexities and considerations surrounding the use of a will written abroad. When dealing with international assets or family circumstances, it’s not uncommon to encounter wills drafted outside the UK. This document aims to provide clarity on the subject, ensuring you’re well-informed about your options and the legal

  • unreasonable behaviour
    How To Divorce On The Grounds Of Unreasonable Behaviour

    Recent changes to divorce proceedings in the UK have brought about significant reforms to outdated laws dating back to 1973. These new divorce laws eliminate the requirement to attribute blame to a partner using grounds such as “unreasonable behaviour.” Under the revised laws, the sole accepted ground for divorce is the irretrievable breakdown of the